Psychopharmacology & biological narcology

Scientific and theoretical peer-reviewed journal

Editor-in-chief

  • Prof. Petr D. Shabanov, MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)

Publisher

About

The purpose of the journal is to acquaint the professional audience, doctors, researchers of medical, biological and veterinary specialties, teachers of higher education with the latest developments in the field of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology of the central nervous system, psychopharmacology, psychoneuroendocrinology, prevention and treatment of chemical and non-chemical addictions, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics new drugs, neurochemistry, immunopharmacology and immunochemistry. The journal is also intended to publish the main materials of dissertation research in the field of pharmacology and clinical pharmacology, human and animal physiology, biochemistry, pathological physiology, psychiatry and narcology.

Journal topics

  • physiology

  • biochemistry and pharmacology of the central nervous system

  • psychopharmacology

  • psychoneuroendocrinology

  • prevention and treatment of chemical and non-chemical addictions

  • pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of new drugs

  • neurochemistry

  • immunopharmacology and immunochemistry.

Specialties of HAC

  • 3.3.6. Pharmacology, clinical pharmacology (medical and biological sciences)
  • 1.5.5. Human and animal physiology (medical and biological sciences) 1.5.4. Biochemistry (medical and biological sciences)
  • 3.3.3. Pathological physiology (medical and biological sciences)
  • 3.1.17. Psychiatry and Narcology (medical sciences)

Sections

  • Scientific reviews
  • Original Research
  • Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Neuropsychoendocrinology
  • Biological narcology
  • From the history of science
  • Book reviews
  • Significant dates

Indexation

  • Russian Science Citation Index (elibrary.ru)
  • Google Scholar
  • WorldCat
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • CyberLeninka
  • VINITI

Current Issue

Vol 16, No 3 (2025)

Cover Page

Full Issue

Reviews

The battle over “food addiction”. Translation into Russian
Lustig R.H.
Abstract

Despite decades of nutrition, obesity, and diabetes research, and worsening prevalences and severities of virtually every chronic metabolic disease, the scientific community remains divided over the existence and veracity of the concept of food addiction. There are numerous rationalizations — 1) you need food to survive, (of which “Food is Medicine” is the latest mantra); 2) people with obesity should not be stigmatized as “mentally ill”; 3) people with obesity should instead adhere to “personal responsibility”; 4) the data are incomplete and not strong enough; 5) it’s correlation but not causation; 6) everyone is exposed, but not everyone is addicted; 7) there is no “withdrawal” phenotype; and 8) it’s not “food addiction” but “eating addiction”. All are in play, yet more health care dollars are diverted to the treatment of food-related disease every year. While various ingestible chemicals (e.g. nicotine, cocaine, heroin, alcohol) are clearly addictive, it appears to be a stretch by some scientists to argue that individual substances found in food (e.g. sugar, caffeine), or the food itself (e.g. ultraprocessed food), rise to meet the same criteria. Symposia on food addiction proliferate and journal debates continue. The definition of addiction consists of numerous criteria, including public health demographics, biochemistry, imaging, animal trials, clinical trials, and economics. None of these have proven to be “slam dunks” to align a general consensus. But paramount for scientific acceptance is the delineation of mechanism. This article will review the history of the controversy, the data on which foods are most likely to be addictive, the two mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of food addiction and relate it to the most likely culprits, and the role of the food industry in promulgating false narratives, in order to provide a rational way forward from this debate.

Psychopharmacology & biological narcology. 2025;16(3):145-160
pages 145-160 views
Inflammatory biomarkers as a tool for personalized therapy in alcohol-related disorders
Sokolova S.I., Skryabin V.Y., Ardamatskaya L.K., Masyakin A.V.
Abstract

This review examines the potential of inflammatory biomarkers to support the personalization of therapy in alcohol-related disorders, including alcohol withdrawal syndrome. A targeted review of clinical studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases between January 2000 and July 2025 was conducted. The most consistently reproducible findings include alterations in interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-18, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), and markers of endotoxemia. Elevated levels of these biomarkers during chronic alcohol use and early after cessation are associated with greater severity of alcohol withdrawal syndrome, risk of delirium and seizures, sleep disturbances, cognitive impairments, infectious complications, and unfavorable one-year survival outcomes. Most proinflammatory indicators decline within 1–4 weeks of abstinence; however, some remain elevated. CRP influences both clinical and neuroimaging responses to treatments with neuroimmune mechanisms of action; peripheral CRP concentration correlates with the frontal choline peak on proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (^1H-MRS) and predicts short-term alcohol consumption (behavioral metrics such as number of heavy drinking days). Excessive REM sleep (Rapid Eye Movement) is associated with TNF-α activity and predicts relapse. Immunogenetic variations, including polymorphisms in the IL17RB gene and components of the NF-κB (Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) pathway, are associated with response to maintenance pharmacotherapy and risk of returning to alcohol use. The collective evidence supports the use of inflammatory biomarker panels for early risk stratification, monitoring remission quality, identifying candidates for immune-targeted interventions, and for the correction of intestinal permeability. The main limitations of studies in this area include small and heterogeneous samples and insufficient standardization of panels, underscoring the need for large, longitudinal studies with detailed patient phenotyping.

Psychopharmacology & biological narcology. 2025;16(3):161-172
pages 161-172 views
Rationale for integrated nutrient support in schizophrenia: a brief review
Zhilyaeva T.V., Mazo G.E.
Abstract

Schizophrenia is a chronic and disabling disorder that often shows limited response to standard psychopharmacotherapy. For several decades, deficiencies of various nutrients have been investigated as etiopathogenetic factors of this condition, with the hypothesis that their correction may contribute to treatment optimization. This brief review aimed to summarize existing research data on the potential synergistic effects of correcting folate metabolism disturbances, redox imbalance, and vitamin D deficiency in schizophrenia. This review examines studies demonstrating shared pathogenetic mechanisms underlying these biochemical abnormalities and their combined contribution to the etiology and pathogenesis of schizophrenia. The research data review and analysis of several points of intersection among folate metabolic pathways, vitamin D metabolism, and oxidative stress enabled the authors to propose a rationale for integrated nutrient support in schizophrenia. Hypothetically, a combined approach involving methylfolate, vitamin D, and a precursor of reduced glutathione synthesis (N-acetylcysteine) may be a more effective strategy than the use of each agent individually. However, this hypothesis requires dedicated clinical studies, as the effects of the triad have not yet been studied. Nonetheless, the combined approach may be justified based on the pathogenesis of schizophrenia, given the interrelation of metabolic pathways, shared mechanisms of action, and several potential therapeutic targets.

Psychopharmacology & biological narcology. 2025;16(3):173-180
pages 173-180 views

Original Study Articles

Therapeutic approaches to psychoses induced by synthetic cathinones (“bath salts”): findings from a pilot observational study
Vinnikova M.A., Severtsev V.V.
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Substance-induced psychotic disorders constitute a heterogeneous group of psychiatric conditions that include both intoxication-related psychoses and endogenous psychoses occurring during psychoactive substance use. Selecting an optimal therapy for such psychoses remains challenging. Despite the critical importance of managing synthetic cathinone-induced psychoses, existing studies typically describe therapeutic strategies and lack a comparative analysis. This article systematizes current approaches to managing psychoses associated with the use of synthetic cathinones.

AIM: This study aimed to determine potential therapeutic strategies for cathinone-induced psychoses and to identify associations between treatment approaches, psychosis subtype, duration of psychotic symptoms, changes in positive symptoms, and severity of cognitive impairment.

METHODS: The study included 98 patients >18 years with psychotic disorders. Synthetic cathinones or their metabolites were detected in biological samples using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) was used to assess the severity and trends in psychotic symptoms on days 1 and 10 of psychosis. Upon resolution of psychosis, defined as cessation of delusions and/or hallucinations, cognitive impairment was evaluated using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scale.

RESULTS: Four principal therapeutic strategies were identified: a basic strategy incorporating infusion therapy and benzodiazepines; two strategies combining basic regimen with either typical or atypical antipsychotics; and a strategy involving forced diuresis and propofol. Psychosis duration was found to be determined primarily by psychosis subtype rather than therapeutic strategy. BPRS scores on days 1 and 10 differed significantly (F = 347.5; pANOVA < 0.0001). BPRS scores decreased by 52.1% with the basic strategy (q = 2.732; pTukey < 0.0001); by 45.0% with typical-antipsychotic strategy (q = 3.020; pTukey < 0.0001); by 22.2% with atypical-antipsychotic strategy (q = 3.874; pTukey = 0.0074); by 53.3% with the strategy combining forced diuresis and anesthetic agents (q = 3.139; pTukey < 0.0001). Analysis of MMSE scores showed that after the resolution of psychotic symptoms, the mean score was 25.9 ± 0.75. Between-group ANOVA revealed no significant differences (F = 0.6731; R2 = 0.02060; pANOVA = 0.5706).

CONCLUSION: Standardizing therapeutic approaches to psychoses induced by psychoactive substances is an essential step toward establishing effective clinical pathways for these patients. This study systematizes therapeutic approaches and compares selected psychometric parameters across different treatment strategies.

Psychopharmacology & biological narcology. 2025;16(3):181-192
pages 181-192 views
Cross-sectional study of the risk of cognitive impairment associated with COVID-19 and a prognostic scale for psychopharmacotherapy selection in outpatient settings
Sorokin M.Y., Gerasimchuk E.S., Lutova N.B., Zubova E.Y.
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is a widespread issue that affects patients’ quality of life and social functioning. Such impairments may result from neurological and psychiatric disorders, as well as from somatic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension, and from COVID-19 and post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the relationship between cognitive impairment and pharmacotherapy, particularly the use of antipsychotic medications, which may worsen cognitive deficits. However, data enabling prediction of such impairments, necessary for developing recommendations for pharmacotherapy adjustment based on cognitive-risk profiles, remain insufficient.

AIM: This study aimed to identify quantitative associations between risk factors and the development of cognitive impairment in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS: This cross-sectional study included patients from outpatient medical services in Saint Petersburg and the Leningrad Region who sought assistance for COVID-19 between December 2020 and May 2021. Inclusion required written informed consent and the ability to complete all required study procedures. Exclusion criteria were acute medical conditions, severe adverse effects of pharmacotherapy, and preexisting cognitive impairment. Current cognitive functioning was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) with a diagnostic threshold of 25 points. Predictors included sociodemographic data, medical history, and respiratory rate.

RESULTS: The study involved 66 patients (38 women and 28 men). The median age was 39.5 years [35; 60], and 14% of participants demonstrated clinically significant cognitive impairment. Logistic regression analysis showed that lower educational attainment, older age, endocrine disorders, and a respiratory rate above 22 breaths per minute were associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment. The model demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.4% and specificity of 90%. A scoring scale was developed to estimate risk without computing the logit function, thereby facilitating clinical usability.

CONCLUSION: Social-demographic and clinical risk factors associated with cognitive impairment were identified in patients with COVID-19. The most significant predictors were lower educational attainment and older age, whereas endocrine comorbidity and elevated respiratory rate increased the likelihood of cognitive impairment. These findings may be considered when selecting psychopharmacotherapeutic strategies.

Psychopharmacology & biological narcology. 2025;16(3):193-202
pages 193-202 views

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».