Intermarriages: Factors, Characteristics and their Impact on Family and Society (Foreign Research Review)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Intermarriage is one of the striking examples of extreme diversity as a key characteristic of the modern world. The most common and the most actively studied form of intermarriage are interracial, interethnic and interfaith marriages, as evidenced by the situations in different countries, primarily those that are actively accepting migrants. Studying intermarriages requires a complex approach that primarily includes an understanding of their place and role in migration, socio-economic, demographic and socio-cultural processes both in each country individually and globally. Based on this premise the author focuses on foreign studies of intermarriages in countries that actively accept migrants, such as the United States, Canada, Australia and Western European countries. The narrative logic consists of systematizing the recurring themes and problems of this social phenomenon which are united by the goal of identifying and describing the features of intermarriages, often from the perspective of comparison with monogamous marriages.The review is divided into two parts. The first one briefly examines the conceptual basis of intermarriage studies which consists of theories united by the concept of exchange: the theory of social exchange, the theory of the marriage market and the transaction model — in sociology; theory of interdependence, investment model and theory of resource exchange — in social psychology. The second part focuses on three topics that most vividly reveal the features of any type of intermarriage. Firstly, the external factors determining physical and socio-cultural accessibility that create either opportunities or restrictions for mixed marriages are considered. Among the individual factors are age, gender, education, and socioeconomic status, religious, ethnic or racial affiliation which are considered both as personal qualities of participants in the marriage market and as exchanged resources. The review is concluded by analyzing how intermarriage influences the partners in marriage, as well as the communities to which the partners belong, and society as a whole. From the partners’ perspective the psychological and socio-psychological qualities that determine the stability of intra-family relations of mixed unions, conflicts and their resolution are considered. The long-term influence is determined through the place and role of children born in mixed marriages, as well as through the place and role of intermarriages in the mutual social integration of different groups in general.

About the authors

Vera M. Peshkova

Institute of Sociology of the FCTAS RAS

Email: pever@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3530-922X
SPIN-code: 1436-3640
ResearcherId: ABB-2638-2021
Candidate of Historical Sciences, Leading Researcher Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Беккер Г. Выбор партнера на брачных рынках // THESIS. 1994. Вып. 6.С. 12-36.
  2. Лурье С.В. Межэтнические браки в современном российском национальном сценарии // Петербургская социология сегодня. 2018. № 10. С. 122-148 doi: 10.25990/socinstras.pss-10.414k-p077 EDN: YUKHZB
  3. Поллак Р. Трансакционный подход к изучению семьи и домашнего хозяйства // THESIS. 1994. Вып. 6. С. 50-76.
  4. Сороко Е.Л. Этнически смешанные супружеские пары в Российской Федерации // Демографическое обозрение. 2014. Т. 1. № 4. С. 96-123. doi: 10.17323/demreview.v1i4.1804 EDN: TTGXUR
  5. Сусоколов А.А. Межнациональные браки в СССР. М.: Мысль, 1987. — 142 с.
  6. Топилин А.В. Межнациональные семьи и миграция: вопросы взаимовлияния // Социологические исследования. 1995. № 7. С. 76—82. EDN: CPGGEM
  7. Куропятник М.С. Суперразнообразие: реконфигурация культурной сложности контекстов современности // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология. 2020. Т. 20. № 3. C. 461-470. doi: 10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-3-461-470. EDN: IWNPZA (In Russ.)
  8. Alba R., Nee V. Rethinking Assimilation Theory for a New Era of Immigration. International Migration Review. Special Issue: Immigrant Adaptation and Native- Born Responses in The Making of Americans. 1997. Vol. 31. No. 4. P. 826-874. doi: 10.2307/2547416
  9. Aldridge D.P. Interracial Marriages: Empirical and Theoretical Considerations. Journal of Black Studies. 1978. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 355-368. doi: 10.1177/002193477800800308
  10. Amoateng A.Y., Kalule-Sabiti I. Social Context Factors and Attitudes toward Interracial Relationships on a South African University Campus. Supplement on Population Issues in South Africa. 2014. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 623-635. doi: 10.11564/28-0-520.
  11. Barfield T. (ed). The dictionary of anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1997. 626 p.
  12. Bell C.G., Hastings S.O. Black and White Interracial Couples: Managing Relational Disapproval Through Facework. Howard Journal of Communications. 2011. Vol. 22. No. 3. P. 240-259. doi: 10.1080/10646175.2011.590405
  13. Blau P.M., Beeker C., Fitzpatrick K.M. Intersecting Social Affiliations and Intermarriage. Social Forces. 1984. Vol. 62. No. 3. P. 585-606. doi: 10.2307/2578701
  14. Bratter J.L., Eschbach K. “What about the couple?” Interracial Marriage and Psychological Distress. Social Science Research. 2006. Vol. 35. No. 4. P. 1025-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.09.001
  15. Bryant C.M., Duncan J.C. Interracial Marriages: Historical and Contemporary Trends. Biracial Families: Crossing Boundaries, Blending Cultures, and Challenging Racial Ideologies. Ed. by R.N. Roy, A. Rollins. Springer, Cham. 2018. P. 81-104. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-96160-6_5
  16. Caltabiano N.J. How Ethnicity and Religion Affect Attitudes Towards Mixed Marriages. Australian Journal of Sex, Marriage and Family. 1985. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 221-229. doi: 10.1080/01591487.1985.11004330
  17. Campbell M.E., Herman M.R. Both Personal and Public: Measuring Interethnic Marriage Attitudes. Journal of Social Issues. 2015. Vol. 71. No. 4. P. 712-732. doi: 10.1111/josi.12145
  18. Cerroni-Long E.L. Marrying Out: Socio-Cultural and Psychological Implications of Intermarriage. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 1985. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 25-46. doi: 10.3138/jcfs.16.1.25
  19. Chimbos P.D. Immigrants' Attitudes Toward Their Children's Inter-Ethnic Marriages in a Canadian Community. International Migration Review. 1971. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 5-17. doi: 10.2307/3002043
  20. Clark E.M., Harris A.L., Hasan M., Votaw K.B., Fernandez P. Concluding Thoughts: Interethnic Marriage Through the Lens of Interdependence Theory. Journal of Social Issues. 2015. Vol. 71. No. 4. P. 821-833. doi: 10.1111/josi.1215
  21. Clark-Ibanez M., Felmlee D. Interethnic Relationships: The Role of Social Network Diversity. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2004. Vol. 66. No. 2. P. 293-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00021.x
  22. Coley N., Jacobson S., Johanson T., Kirby S. The Colors of Love: Attitudes toward Interethnic Romantic Relationships among College Students. 2008. Accessed 20.03.2024. URL: https://wp.stolaf.edu/sociology/files/2013/06/The-Colors-of-Love.pdf
  23. Crespin-Boucaud J. Interethnic and Interfaith Marriages in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development. 2020. Vol. 125. Article 104668. P. 1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104668
  24. Eisnecker P.S. Non-migrants' Interethnic Relationships with Migrants: The Role of the Residential Area, the Workplace, and Attitudes toward Migrants from a Longitudinal Perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2019. Vol. 45. No. 5. P. 804-824. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1394180
  25. Ellison C.G., Powers D.A. The Contact Hypothesis and Racial Attitudes Among Black Americans. Social Science Quarterly. 1994. Vol. 75. No. 2. P. 385-400.
  26. Emerson M.O., Kimbro R.T., Yancey G. Contact Theory Extended: The Effects of Prior Racial Contact on Current Social Ties. Social Science Quarterly. 2002. Vol. 83. No. 3. P. 745-761. doi: 10.1111/1540-6237.00112
  27. Foa U.G., Foa E.B. Societal Structures of the Mind. Springfield, IL: Thomas. 1974. 468 р.
  28. Fulias-Souroulla M. Marriage and Migration: Representations and Attitudes of Greek Cypriot towards Inter-Societal Marriage. The Cyprus Review. 2018. Vol. 20. No. 2. P. 117-143.
  29. Gaines S.O., Clark E.M., Afful S.E. Interethnic Marriage in the United States: An Introduction. Journal of Social Issues. 2015. Vol. 71. No. 4. P. 647-658. doi: 10.1111/josi.12141
  30. Gordon M.M. Assimilation in America: Theory and Reality. Daedalus 90. Ethnic Groups in American Life. 1961. Vol. 90. No. 2. P. 263-285.
  31. Herman M.R., Campbell M.E. I Wouldn't, But You Can: Attitudes Toward Interracial Relationships. Social Science Research. 2012. Vol. 41. No. 2. P. 343-358. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.11.007
  32. Herzog S.R., Samuel M., Cho S., Ammons E., Lee H. Perceptions of Interracial Marriage Through the Eyes of Individualistic and Collectivist Cultures Intuition: The BYU. Undergraduate Journal of Psychology. 2015. Vol. 10. No. 2. Article 6. P. 63-75.
  33. Hohmann-Marriott B.E., Amato P. Relationship Quality in Interethnic Marriages and Cohabitations. Social Forces. 2008. Vol. 87. No. 2. P. 825-855. doi: 10.1353/sof.0.0151
  34. Huijnk W., Verkuyten M., Coenders M. Family Relations and the Attitude towards Ethnic Minorities as Close Kin by Marriage. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2013. Vol. 36. No. 11. P. 1890-1909. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2012.699086
  35. Jacobs J.A., Labov T.G. Gender Differentials in Intermarriage among Sixteen Race and Ethnic Groups. Sociological Forum. 2002. Vol. 17. No. 4. P. 621-646. doi: 10.1023/a:1021029507937
  36. Joyner K., Kao G. Interracial Relationships and the Transition to Adulthood. American Sociological Review. 2005. Vol. 70. No. 4. P. 563-581. doi: 10.1177/000312240507000402
  37. Kalmijn M. Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends. Annual Review of Sociology. 1998. Vol. 24. P. 395-421.
  38. Kalmijn M. The Children of Intermarriage in Four European Countries. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2015. Vol. 662. No. 1. P. 246-265. doi: 10.1177/0002716215595391
  39. Kelley H.H., Thibaut J. Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. N.Y.: Wiley, 1978. 352 р.
  40. Kenney K.R., Kenney M.E. Contemporary US Multiple Heritage Couples, Individuals, and Families: Issues, Concerns, and Counseling Implications. Counselling Psychology Quarterly. 2012. Vol. 25. No. 2. P. 99-112. DOI: 10.10 80/09515070.2012.674682
  41. Leslie L.A., Young J.L. Interracial Couples in Therapy: Common Themes and Issues. Journal of Social Issues. 2015. Vol. 71. No. 4. P. 788-803. doi: 10.1111/josi.12149
  42. Lichter D.T., Carmalt J.H., Qian Z. Immigration and Intermarriage among Hispanics: Crossing Racial and Generational Boundaries. Sociological Forum. 2011. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 241-264. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01239.x
  43. Livingston G., Brown A. Intermarriage in the U.S. 50 Years After Loving v. Virginia. Pew Research Center. 2017. Accessed 13.07.2024. URL: https://www. pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/05/18/intermarriage-in-the-u-s-50-years-after-loving-v-virginia/
  44. Mclennan J.F. Primitive Marriage: An Inquiry into the Origin of the Form of Capture in Marriage Ceremonies. Edinburgh: Adam & Charles Black, 1865. 326 р. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.50206
  45. Merton R.K. Intermarriage and the Social Structure. Psychiatry. 1941. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 361-374. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1941.11022354
  46. Mixed Unions in Canada. National Household Survey (NHS). 2011. Accessed 20.03.2024. URL: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/as-sa/99-010-x/99-010-x2011003_3-eng.pdf
  47. Osanami Torngren S. Attitudes Toward Interracial Marriages and the Role of Interracial Contacts in Sweden. Ethnicities. 2016. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 568-588. doi: 10.1177/1468796816638400
  48. Peres Y., Schrift R. Intermarriage and Interethnic Relations: A Comparative Study. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 1978. Vol. 1. No. 4. P. 428-451. DOI: 10.108 0/01419870.1978.9993243
  49. Perry S.L. Racial Composition of Social Settings, Interracial Friendship, and Whites' Attitudes toward Interracial Marriage. The Social Science Journal. 2013. Vol. 50. No. 1. P. 13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2012.09.001
  50. Portes A., Zhou M. The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Interminority Affairs in the U.S.: Pluralism at the Crossroads. 1993. Vol. 530. P. 74-96. doi: 10.1177/0002716293530001006
  51. Qian Z., Lichter D.T. Social Boundaries and Marital Assimilation: Interpreting Trends in Racial and Ethnic Intermarriage. American Sociological Review. 2007. Vol. 72. No. 1. P. 68-94. doi: 10.1177/000312240707200104
  52. Rodriguez-Garcla D. Intermarriage and Integration Revisited. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2015. Vol. 662. No. 1. P. 8-36. doi: 10.1177/0002716215601397
  53. Rosenfeld M.J. Back to Basics: Examining the Essence of Merton's Status Exchange Theory Using Husband-Wife Education Difference. Accessed 20.03.2024. URL: https://paa2015.populationassociation.org/papers/152009
  54. Rusbult C.E., Agnew C.R., Arriaga X.B. The Investment Model of Commitment Processes. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. Ed. by P.A. van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, E.T. Higgins. Los Angeles: Sage. 2012. P. 218-231. doi: 10.4135/9781446249222.n37
  55. Sarantakos S. Marriage and the Family in Australia: A Multi-Cultural Study. Sidney: Budget Pub Books, 1980. 208 р.
  56. Seshadri G., Knudson-Martin C. How Couples Manage Interracial and Intercultural Differences: Implications for Clinical Practice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 2013. Vol. 39. No. 1. P. 43-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00262.x
  57. Song M. Multiracial People and Their Partners in Britain: Extending the Link Between Intermarriage and Integration? Ethnicities. 2016. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 631-648. doi: 10.1177/1468796816638399
  58. Song M., Aspinall P. Is Racial Mismatch a Problem for Young “Mixed Race” People in Britain? The Findings of Qualitative Research. Ethnicities. 2012. Vol. 12. No. 6. P. 730-753. doi: 10.1177/1468796811434912
  59. Stewart K.A. Interracial Intimacy and the U.S. Racial Structure: How Interracial Marriages Challenge and Reinforce Racial Boundaries: Dissertation. Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology. 2019. Accessed 20.03.2024. URL: https://escholarship.org/con-tent/qt10c236nz/qt10c236nz.pdf
  60. Sullivan C., Cottone R.R. Culturally Based Couple Therapy and Intercultural Relationships: A Review of the Literature. The Family Journal. 2006. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 221-225. doi: 10.1177/1066480706287278
  61. Tegunimataka A. The Intergenerational Effects of Intermarriage. Journal of International Migration and Integration. 2020. P. 1-22. doi: 10.1007/s12134-019-00745-1
  62. Trilla C.C., Esteve A., Domingo A. Marriage Patterns of the Foreign-Born Population in a New Country of Immigration: The Case of Spain. International Migration Review. 2008. Vol. 42. No. 4. P. 877-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2008.00151.x
  63. Uhlich M., Luginbuehl T., Schoebi D. Cultural Diversity Within Couples: Risk or Chance? A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationship Satisfaction. Personal Relationships. 2022. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 120-145. doi: 10.1111/pere.12405
  64. Winthrop D.J. Historical Origins of the One-Drop Racial Rule in the United States. Journal of Critical Mixed Race Studies. 2014. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 98-132. doi: 10.5070/C811013867
  65. Woesthoff J. “When I Marry a Mohammedan”: Migration and the Challenges of Interethnic Marriages in Post-War Germany. Contemporary European History. 2013. No. 22. P. 199-231. doi: 10.1017/S0960777313000052
  66. Wu Z., Schimmele C.M., Hou F. Group Differences in Intermarriage with Whites between Asians, Blacks, and Hispanics: The Effects of Assimilation and Structural Constraints. Journal of Social Issues. 2015. Vol. 71. No. 4. P. 733-754. doi: 10.1111/josi.12146
  67. Yancey G. Who Interracially Dates: An Examination of the Characteristics of Those Who Have Interracially Dated. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 2002. No. 33. P. 179-190. doi: 10.3138/jcfs.33.2.179

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».