电邮这篇文章 The relationship between judicial discretion, judicial law-making, judicial interpretation of contra legem and law enforcement fictions
- 作者: Zatsepina O.E.1
-
隶属关系:
- Altai State University
- 期: 编号 7 (2025)
- 页面: 34-41
- 栏目: Court, prosecutor’s office, bar, notarial system
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/1026-9452/article/view/306380
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945225070041
- ID: 306380
如何引用文章
开放存取
##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
订阅存取
详细
The article examines the essence of judicial discretion in the context of its relationship with related legal concepts. The purpose of the study is to analyze the relationship between judicial discretion, judicial law-making, judicial interpretation contra legem, and law enforcement fictions to verify the possibility of establishing a “genus – type” relationship between them. It has been established that judicial law-making is one of the types of judicial discretion, and interpretation contra legem and law enforcement fictions are special cases of judicial law-making. Law enforcement fictions used in public law contradict the legislation and are a consequence of interpretation contra legem, while in private law they comply with the legislation and represent an independent method of judicial law-making.
作者简介
O. Zatsepina
Altai State University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: zatsepina.olesya@yandex.ru
68 Socialistichesky Ave., 656049 Barnaul, Russia
参考
- Allahverdiyev I. G. Balanced model of interpretation of contra legem: an attempt at justification // Law and Policy. 2021. No. 12. Pp. 69–88 (in Russ.).
- Arzamasov Yu. G. Normography: theory and technology of norm making: the textbook for bachelor’s and master’s degrees. M., 2017 (in Russ.).
- Belousova K. A., Belyaeva G. S., Umarova M. A. The concept and essence of evaluative categories in law // Law and State: Theory and Practice. 2020. No. 8 (188). Pp. 59–62 (in Russ.).
- Berg L. N. Judicial discretion and its limits (general theoretical aspect): abstract … PhD in Law: 12.00.01. Yekaterinburg, 2008 (in Russ.).
- Bogdanovskaya I. Yu. Judicial precedent – a source of law? // State and Law. 2002. Pp. 5–10 (in Russ.).
- Bonner A. T. Judicial discretion and enforcement of lex // Sov. State and Law. 1979. No. 6. Pp. 35–41 (in Russ.).
- Burtseva S. S. The evaluative concepts – a necessary means of achieving the constitutional idea of legal certainty or a factor leading to its violation? // Law Enforcement Review. 2023. Vol. 7. No. 4. Pp. 86–95. doi: 10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).86-95 (in Russ.).
- Gambarov Yu. S. The course of civil law. General part. St. Petersburg, 1911. Vol. 1 (in Russ.).
- Gambaryan A. S. The principle of legality and the provision “the judge obeys the law” in the context of the doctrine of the development of law contra legem // Law Enforcement Review. 2023. Vol. 7. No. 4. Pp. 15–24. doi: 10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).15-24 (in Russ.).
- Zatsepina O. E. Legal presumptions and legal fictions: correlation and development: dis. … PhD in Law: 12.00.01. Belgorod, 2022 (in Russ.).
- Zatsepina O. E. The ratio of legal presumptions and other means of legal technique // Tomsk State University Journal. 2017. No. 424. Pp. 226–233. doi: 10.17223/15617793/424/32 (in Russ.).
- Zyryanov G. D. The judicial discretion: the problem of determining the legal (normative) limits of application: collection of materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with international participation dedicated to the 30th anniversary of the adoption of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Veliky Novgorod, 2023. Pp. 92–98. doi: 10.34680/978-5-89896-886-1/2023.ML.13 (in Russ.).
- Ilyina E. V. Correlation between legal fiction and analogy in law // Herald of VGU. Ser. 9. Research of young scientists. 2012. Vol. 10. Pp. 194, 195 (in Russ.).
- Komissarov K. I. Judicial discretion in Soviet civil proceedings // Sov. State and Law. 1969. No. 4. Pp. 49–56 (in Russ.).
- Makarikhina O. A. On the question of judicial discretion in civil and arbitration proceedings // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2014. No. 6. Pp. 14–17 (in Russ.).
- Marokhin E. Yu. Legal fiction in modern Russian legislation: dis. … PhD in Law: 12.00.01. Stavropol, 2004 (in Russ.).
- Muromtsev S. A. On the conservatism of Roman jurisprudence. M., 1875. (in Russ.).
- Onosov Yu. V. Law enforcement “contra legem” – a means of ensuring justice or a threat to legality? // Legal science and practice. Herald of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2011. No. 1 (14). Pp. 376–381 (in Russ.).
- Papkova O. A. Judicial proving and discretion of court in civil proceedings // State and Law. 2007. No. 2. Pp. 30–35 (in Russ.).
- Pokrovsky I. A. Basic problems of Civil Law. M., 1998 (in Russ.).
- Polyakov S. B. The judicial precedent in Russia: a form of law or arbitrariness? // Lex russia. 2015. No. 3. Vol. C. Pp. 28–42 (in Russ.).
- Tarusina N. N. The judicial interpretation as a kind of “extraordinary” rulemaking // Herald of Yaroslavl State university. Ser. “Humanities”. 2018. No. 3 (45). Pp. 58–62 (in Russ.).
- Fedotov A. V. Is it possible to apply contra legem in a democratic legal state? // Journal of Russian Law. 2002. No. 8 (in Russ.).
- Fioshin A. V. On contra legem interpretation of the norms of inheritance and family legislation // Notarius. 2023. No. 2 (in Russ.).
- Ihering R. Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung. III. 1866.
补充文件
