Constitutionally Relevant Imperfections of Judicial Authority in the Russian Federation


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Fundamental drawbacks of the current domestic organizational and legal framework of all three components of judicial authority are considered—structure, proceedings, and status—which are in one way or another inconsistent with the provisions of article 10, part 1 of article 19, part 5 of article 32, part 1 of article 46, part 1 of article 47, clause “l” of part 1 of article 72, part 2 of article 118, and parts 2 and 3 of article 128 of the Russian Constitution. In the author’s opinion, local changes in individual legislative regulations and adjustments of law enforcement practices would not remedy the situation. Scientifically secured development, approval, and implementation of a state project under the working title “A Fair Trial” are necessary to modernize radically and intricately the entire mechanism of Russian justice, which is comparable in scale with the Judicial Reform of 1864.

作者简介

M. Kleandrov

Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: mklean@ksrf.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2018