Determining the effectiveness of a xenogeneic bone matrix decellularization protocol in in vitro and in vivo studies
- Authors: Smolentsev D.V.1, Lukina Y.S.1, Bionyshev-Abramov L.L.1, Serejnikova N.B.2, Kovalev A.V.1, Berchenko G.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- Priorov Central Institute for Trauma and Orthopedics
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 30, No 4 (2023)
- Pages: 431-443
- Section: Original study articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/0869-8678/article/view/254213
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/vto622849
- ID: 254213
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Restoration of tissue integrity, including bone tissue, is currently an extremely urgent task, both because of the increasing number of high-energy traumas accompanied by severe skeletal injuries and the growing number of revision endoprosthetics requiring the use of bone-plastic materials.
AIM: To determine the efficacy of the developed protocol for decellularization of xenogenic bone matrix in preclinical in vitro studies aimed at defining the purification matrix degree, on the basis of histological, microtomographic evaluation, cell culture method, and in vivo studies aimed at identifying the biocompatibility and osteogenic properties of the materials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Xenogenic spongiosis tissue of bovine femoral bones was fragmented to the size of 10×10×10 mm and treated with water, hypotonic solution and 3% hydrogen peroxide solution, deep purification by supercritical fluid extraction was applied. The efficiency of the optimal protocol was tested in vitro by cell culture method and in vivo.
RESULTS: The ideal interaction of cell culture with bone-plastic material was revealed, which may be associated with the absence of cytotoxic substances in the matrix, optimal roughness and good adhesive properties of the surface suitable for the formation of focal contacts by bone marrow stromal cells, their adhesion, spreading and proliferation. A pronounced bone callus with formed bone bridges running along the surface of the implanted material was determined 30 days after implantation. By this study period, the defect was practically closed due to the intermedial bone callus, the implanted material is found in the form of individual small osteocyte-free fragments.
CONCLUSIONS: The xenogenic bone matrix purified according to the developed protocol is bio- and cytocompatible, has pronounced osteoconductive properties, effectively stimulates regenerative osteogenesis in living organism.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Dmitriy V. Smolentsev
Priorov Central Institute for Trauma and Orthopedics
Author for correspondence.
Email: SmolentsevDV@cito-priorov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5386-1929
Russian Federation, Moscow
Yulia S. Lukina
Priorov Central Institute for Trauma and Orthopedics
Email: lukina_rctu@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0121-1232
SPIN-code: 2814-7745
Cand. Sci. (Tech.)
Russian Federation, MoscowLeonid L. Bionyshev-Abramov
Priorov Central Institute for Trauma and Orthopedics
Email: sity-x@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1326-6794
Russian Federation, Moscow
Natalya B. Serejnikova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Email: natalia.serj@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4097-1552
SPIN-code: 2249-9762
Cand. Sci. (Biol.)
Russian Federation, MoscowAlexey V. Kovalev
Priorov Central Institute for Trauma and Orthopedics
Email: kovalevav@cito-priorov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1277-5228
SPIN-code: 2413-5980
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowGennadiy N. Berchenko
Priorov Central Institute for Trauma and Orthopedics
Email: berchenkogn@cito-priorov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7920-0552
SPIN-code: 3367-2493
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Pelegrine AA, Teixeira ML, Sperandio M, et al. Can bone marrow aspirate concentrate change the mineralization pattern of the anterior maxilla treated with xenografts? A preliminary study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016;7(1):21–6. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.177112
- Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, et al. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol. 2008;79(8):1370–7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070628
- Brugnami F, Then PR, Moroi H, et al. GBR in human extraction sockets and ridge defects prior to implant placement: clinical results and histologic evidence of osteoblastic and osteoclastic activities in DFDBA. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999;19(3):259–67.
- Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, et al. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants — a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009;2(3):167–84.
- Vo TN, Kasper FK, Mikos AG. Strategies for controlled delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2012;64(12):1292–1309. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.016
- Belthur MV, Conway JD, Jindal G, Ranade A, Herzenberg JE. Bone graft harvest using a new intramedullary system. Clin Orthop. 2008;466(12):2973–2980. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0538-3
- Conway JD. Autograft and nonunions: morbidity with intramedullary bone graft versus iliac crest bone graft. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;41(1):75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.07.006
- Schwartz CE, Martha JF, Kowalski P, Wang DA, Bode R, Li L, Kim DH. Prospective evaluation of chronic pain associated with posterior autologous iliac crest bone graft harvest and its effect on postoperative outcome. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:49. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-49
- Bigham AS, Dehghani SN, Shafiei Z, Torabi Nezhad S. Xenogenic demineralized bone matrix and fresh autogenous cortical bone effects on experimental bone healing: radiological, histopathological and biomechanical evaluation. J Orthop Traumatol. 2008;9(2):73–80. doi: 10.1007/s10195-008-0006-6
- Erkhova LV, Panov YM, Gavryushenko NS, et al. Supercritical Treatment of Xenogenic Bone Matrix in the Manufacture of Implants for Osteosynthesis. Russ J Phys Chem B. 2020;14(7):1158–1162. doi: 10.1134/S1990793120070064
- Brydone AS, Meek D, Maclaine S. Bone grafting, orthopaedic biomaterials, and the clinical need for bone engineering. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 2010;224(12):1329–1343. doi: 10.1243/09544119jeim770
- Thangarajah T, Shahbazi S, Pendegrass CJ, Lambert S, Alexander S, Blunn GW. Tendon Reattachment to Bone in an Ovine Tendon Defect Model of Retraction Using Allogenic and Xenogenic Demineralised Bone Matrix Incorporated with Mesenchymal Stem Cells. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0161473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161473
- Sackett SD, Tremmel DM, Ma F, Feeney AK, Maguire RM, Brown ME, et al. Extracellular matrix scaffold and hydrogel derived from decellularized and delipidized human pancreas. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–16. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28857-1
- Hussey GS, Dziki JL, Badylak SF. Extracellular matrix-based materials for regenerative medicine. Nat Rev Mater. 2018;3(7):159–73. doi: 10.1038/s41578-018-0023-x
- Keane TJ, Swinehart IT, Badylak SF. Methods of tissue decellularization used for preparation of biologic scaffolds and in vivo relevance. Methods. 2015;84:25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.03.005
- Hillebrandt KH, Everwien H, Haep N, Keshi E, Pratschke J, Sauer IM. Strategies based on organ decellularization and recellularization. Transpl Int. 2019;32(6):571–85. doi: 10.1111/tri.13462.
- Nonaka PN, Campillo N, Uriarte JJ, et al. Effects of freezing/thawing on the mechanical properties of decellularized lungs. J Biomed Mater Res — Part A. 2014;102(2):413–419. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34708
Supplementary files
