Replacement of extensive bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty: Clinical cases
- Authors: Girkalo M.V.1, Kozadaev M.N.1, Shchanitsin I.N.1, Derevyanov A.V.1, Ostrovskij V.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery of Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 30, No 1 (2023)
- Pages: 87-96
- Section: Clinical case reports
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/0869-8678/article/view/254194
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/vto321241
- ID: 254194
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common orthopedic surgeries; however, the annual increase in the number of TKAs predictably increases the number of revision interventions. The key reasons for revision TKA (reTKA) are aseptic instability, paraimplant infection, postoperative contractures, and periprosthetic fractures. The metaphyseal fixation in reTKA is performed with metaphyseal sleeves, trabecular metal reconstructive cones, or metaphyseal cones made of pure titanium.
CLINICAL CASES DESCRIPTION: This study aimed to investigate and demonstrate the outcomes of reTKAs performed according to our algorithm with various metaphyseal fixators (sleeves and cones). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses do not allow claiming the advantage of one or another metaphyseal fixator with complete certainty, and this issue remains debatable. We report clinical cases that demonstrate the potential of the suggested algorithm for choosing a metaphyseal fixator in TKA, which ensures successful supplements of bone defects, correct spatial orientation, and good clinical and functional outcomes.
CONCLUSION: This study reveals that this new algorithm for choosing a metaphyseal fixator in reTKAs allows for the correct selection of a replacement implant to ensure stable rotational and axial fixation.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Mikhail V. Girkalo
Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery of Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: girkalo@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5847-1153
SPIN-code: 6151-4375
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), traumatologist-orthopedist
Russian Federation, 148 Chernyshevskogo Str., 410002, SaratovMaxim N. Kozadaev
Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery of Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University
Email: m_kozadaev_ortoped@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6235-7193
SPIN-code: 3754-7751
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), traumatologist-orthopedist
Russian Federation, 148 Chernyshevskogo Str., 410002, SaratovIvan N. Shchanitsin
Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery of Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University
Email: dr.green@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0565-5172
SPIN-code: 3653-9302
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), senior researcher
Russian Federation, 148 Chernyshevskogo Str., 410002, SaratovAleksandr V. Derevyanov
Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery of Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University
Email: xandor64@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-0166-8576
SPIN-code: 8003-7321
traumatologist-orthopedist
Russian Federation, 148 Chernyshevskogo Str., 410002, SaratovVladimir V. Ostrovskij
Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery of Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University
Email: sarniito@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8602-2715
SPIN-code: 7078-8019
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), директор
Russian Federation, 148 Chernyshevskogo Str., 410002, SaratovReferences
- Belt M, Hannink G, Smolders J, et al. Reasons for revision are associated with rerevised total knee arthroplasties: an analysis of 8,978 index revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2021;92(5):597–601. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1925036
- Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ. Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(8):624–630. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00285
- Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780–785. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222
- Khan M, Osman K, Green G, Haddad FS. The epidemiology of failure in total knee arthroplasty: avoiding your next revision. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):105–112. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36293
- Yapp LZ, Walmsley PJ, Moran M, et al. The effect of hospital case volume on re-revision following revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(4):602–609. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1901.R1
- Rodríguez-Merchán EC, Gómez-Cardero P, Encinas-Ullán CA. Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: therapeutic options and results. EFORT Open Rev. 2021;6(11):1073–1086. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210007
- Byttebier P, Dhont T, Pintelon S, et al. Comparison of Different Strategies in Revision Arthroplasty of the Knee with Severe Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(6S):S371.e4–S381.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.103
- Morgan-Jones R, Oussedik SI, Graichen H, Haddad FS. Zonal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(2):147–149. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34144
- Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:167–175.
- Lei PF, Hu RY, Hu YH. Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty and Management. Orthop Surg. 2019;11(1):15–24. doi: 10.1111/os.12425
- Kulyaba TA, Kornilov NN, Selin AV, et al. The ways of bone defects compensation in revision knee arthroplasty. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2011;17(3):5–12. (In Russ). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2011-0-3-5-12
- Bourne RB, Crawford HA. Principles of revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29(2):331–337. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70331-x
- Bauman RD, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Limitations of structural allograft in revision total knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(3):818–824. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0679-4
- Lotke PA, Carolan GF, Puri N. Impaction grafting for bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:99–103. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000214414.06464.00
- Patel JV, Masonis JL, Guerin J, et al. The fate of augments to treat type-2 bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(2):195–199. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b2.13564
- Bovkis GY, Kulyaba TA, Kornilov NN. Management of femur and tibia metaphyseal bone defects during revision knee arthroplasty — methods and outcomes (review). Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2016;(2):101–113. (In Russ). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2016-0-2-101-113
- Bohl DD, Brown NM, McDowell MA, et al. Do porous tantalum metaphyseal cones improve outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(1):171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.033
- Huang R, Barrazueta G, Ong A, et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty using metaphyseal sleeves at short-term follow-up. Orthopedics. 2014;37(9):e804–e809. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140825-57
- Bloch BV, Shannak OA, Palan J, et al. Metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty provide reliable fixation and excellent medium to long-term implant survivorship. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(2):495–499. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.027
- Beckmann NA, Mueller S, Gondan M, et al. Treatment of severe bone defects during revision total knee arthroplasty with structural allografts and porous metal cones — a systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(2):249–253. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.016
- Alexander GE, Bernasek TL, Crank RL, Haidukewych GJ. Cementless metaphyseal sleeves used for large tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(4):604–607. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.00
- Agarwal S, Neogi DS, Morgan-Jones R. Metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Minimum seven-year follow-up study. Knee. 2018;25(6):1299–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.09.010
- Patent Rus № 2777929/11.08.2022. Byul. № 23. Girkalo MV. Sposob podbora metafizarnogo fiksatora dlya zameshcheniya obshirnykh defektov bol’shebertsovoi kosti pri revizionnom endoprotezirovanii kolennogo sustava. Available from: https://findpatent.ru/patent/277/2777929.html. Accessed: 02.05.2023. (In Russ).
- Floría-Arnal LJ, Gómez-Blasco A, Roche-Albero A, et al. Tibial tray cementation is not necessary for knee revision with titanium metaphyseal sleeves: a mid-term prospective study in AORI 2B defects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(10):3310–3315. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06185-0.
Supplementary files
