Email this article The Viability of a Rural Settlement Center: The Case of Oktyabrskoye Township, Republic of Crimea
- Authors: Gusakov T.Y1
-
Affiliations:
- The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
- Issue: Vol 157, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 655–671
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/0869-6071/article/view/361916
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034538325040103
- ID: 361916
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article analyzes a model of sustainable rural development using the example of the urban-type settlement of Oktyabrskoye, located in a nonurbanized steppe area of the Crimean Peninsula. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach, it examines factors that contribute to a settlement’s internal resilience: transport and social infrastructure, commuting-based employment, maintenance of local economic activity, horizontal ties within the community, and residents’ participation in community governance and grassroots initiatives. Oktyabrskoye functions as a cluster (hub) center, effectively serving adjacent rural localities and forming a rural agglomeration despite lacking formal administrative status. The Crimean context adds particular significance to the study by combining ethnocultural diversity with institutional volatility, both of which shape spatial and social resilience. The findings suggest that the resilience of such settlements rests less on external resources than on the community’s capacity for self-organization, adaptation, and the upkeep of core functions. The Oktyabrskoye case illustrates the potential of small and intermediate centers within rural settlement systems and can inform regional policy measures aimed at preserving the rural settlement network.
About the authors
T. Y Gusakov
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Email: gusakov.timur@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8557-9108
Researcher, Center for Agrarian Studie Moscow, Russian Federation
References
- Gusakov T.Y. Razvitie sotsial’nogo kapitala sel’skoy mestnosti na Krymskom poluostrove (na primere sela Novoalekseevka). Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sotsiologiya. 2023. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 156–171.
- Ezhegodnyy otchet Predsedatelya Oktyabr’skogo sel’skogo soveta – glavy administratsii Oktyabr’skogo sel’skogo poseleniya Krasnogvardeyskogo rayona Respubliki Krym Mel’nikova V.V. o rezul’tatakh deyatel’nosti za 2016–2017 gody (2017) / Respublika Krym. Portal Pravitel’stva. URL: https://octyabrsckoe.rk.gov.ru/documents/492ed34f-500a-4ff5-80a9-709a872b4f75 (data obrashcheniya: 11.03.2024).
- Kapelyushnikov R.A. Vklad Geri Bekkera v ekonomicheskuyu teoriyu / V kn.: Bekker G.S. Chelovecheskoe povedenie: ekonomicheskiy podkhod. Moscow: GU VSHE, 2003. Pp. 645–671.
- Nemirovs’ka G.V. Sotsial’na tolerantnist’ naselennya terytoriy frontyru / Modernizatsiyni protsesy ta transformatsiya tsinnostey. Materialy zasidannya kruhloho stolu. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannya. 2013. No. 1. Pp. 148–149.
- Oktyabr’skoe. Krasnogvardeyskiy rayon / Istoriya gorodov i sel Ukrainskoy SSR v 26 t. Vol. 12. Krymskaya oblast’. Kiev: Glavnaya redaktsiya USE, 1974. Pp. 343–348.
- Otsenka chislennosti gorodskogo i sel’skogo naseleniya na 1 yanvarya 2016–2025 gg., Krasnogvardeyskiy munitsipal’nyy rayon. Respublika Krym / Baza dannykh pokazateley munitsipal’nykh obrazovaniy. Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/dbscripts/munst/munst35/DBInet.cgi
- Postanovlenie Soveta Ministrov Respubliki Krym ot 11 dekabrya 2019 goda No. 723 “Ob utverzhdenii perechnya sel’skikh territoriy Respubliki Krym”. URL: https://sakimo.rk.gov.ru/uploads/txteditor/sakimo/attachments//d4/1d/8c/d98000b204e9800998ecf8427e/phpUMLzw6_2.pdf
- Raspisanie Oktyabr’skoe AS / GUP RK “Krymatotrans”. URL: http://www.kat82.ru/shedule/323
- Smirnova A.A., Smirnov I.P., Tkachenko A.A. Rasselenie: osnovnye ponyatiya, podkhody, rezul’taty issledovaniy. Tver’: Tverskoy gos. universitet, 2024. 224 p.
- Tkachenko A.A. Klyuchevye ponyatiya teorii rasseleniya: popytka pereosmysleniya. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 5: Geografiya. 2018. No. 2. P. 10–15.
- Tkachenko A.A., Smirnov I.P., Fomkina A.A. O “chetnykh” urovnyakh tsentrov rasseleniya. Mnogovektornost’ v razvitii regionov Rossii: resursy, strategii i novye trendy / IGRAN; otv. red. Streletskiy V.N. Irkutsk: IP Matushkina I.I., 2017. Pp. 71–81.
- Cloke P. Counterurbanisation: a Rural Perspective. Geography, Vol. 70, № 1 (January 1985), pp. 13–23.
- Christaller W. Central Places in Southern Germany / Translated by Carlisle W. Baskin. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966. 400 p.
- Desch A., Holmberg C., Demmerer N., Euler S., Jaehn P., Bergholz A. Opportunities, challenges, and future directions for the public social participation of older adults living in a rural region in Germany: Results from a mixed-methods study. Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 114. 2025.
- OECD. Rural Well-being: Geography of Opportunities, OECD Rural Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2020. 218 p.
- Putnam R. Bowling Alone. New York: Simon and Schuster Paperbacks, 2000. 544 p.
- Sen’ D.V. Frontier Research in Present-day Russia: shaky boundaries of the academic dialogue. Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2020. Vol. 1 (27). P. 66–80.
- Vale L.J., Campanella T.J. The Resilient City: How Modern Cities Recover from Disaster. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 392 p.
Supplementary files
