Migration power centers in world politics
- Authors: Tsapenko I.P.1, Subkhangulova K.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: No 8 (2025)
- Pages: 58-70
- Section: Point of view
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/0869-5873/article/view/305409
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587325080069
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/dthzdk
- ID: 305409
Cite item
Abstract
In the emerging polycentric and multi-level architecture of the world order, in addition to the supporting system of centers of power in their classical understanding, new power subsystems are being built, in particular, migration. Centers of migration power can be defined as international actors, primarily major participants in migration processes, who are capable of achieving foreign policy goals with the help of migration tools and, under specific conditions, realize this potential. The difference in migration positions – recipient, donor, transit population or combinations of these statuses – presupposes a variety of centers of power in the migration field depending on the role they play (immigration, emigration or transit). The migration status of a country is reflected in a wide range and variability of the use of persuasion tools: from the weaponization of human flows and sanctions against migration to cooperation in the field of migration and the promotion of an attractive image of the country with the help of liberal and inclusive migration policy measures. In addition to leading powers, migration force centers may also include states that acquire leadership in the subregional migration space of foreign policy in the appropriate context and time interval, which determines the mobility and variability of the configuration of migration force centers. The current development of migration and the strengthening of its connection with foreign policy processes indicate an expansion of the use of migration force and an increase in the role of migration force centers in international relations.
About the authors
I. P. Tsapenko
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: tsapenko@bk.ru
Moscow, Russia
K. A. Subkhangulova
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: ksubkhangulova@yandex.ru
Moscow, Russia
References
- Nye J.S. Soft power: the means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2004.
- Saltalamacchia N., Urzúa M.-J. Migration power in interstate relations: A conceptual approach // Working paper. 2024. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4863344
- Fernández-Molina I., Tsourapas G. Understanding migration power in international studies // International Affairs. 2024, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 2461–2479. doi: 10.1093/ia/iiae230
- Teitelbaum M. Immigration, refugees and foreign policy // International Organization. 1984, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 429–450. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300026801
- Акопов А.К. Политико-исторические концепции мирового порядка в теории международных отношений // Научно-технические ведомости Санкт-Петербургского государственного политехнического университета. Гуманитарные и общественные науки. 2013. № 4 (184). С.134–141. Akopov A.K. Political and historical concepts of world order in the international relations theory // St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2013, no. 4(184), pp. 134–141. (In Russ.)
- Сирота Н.М. Новый мировой порядок: тенденции и перспективы становления // Saarbrücken: Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2016. Sirota N.M. New world order: trends and prospects of formation // Saarbrücken: Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2016. (In Russ.)
- Шаклеина Т.А. Великие державы и региональные подсистемы // Международные процессы. 2011. Т. 9. № 2. С. 29–39. Shakleina T.A. Great powers and regional subsystems // International Trends. 2011, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 29–39. (In Russ.)
- Кузнецов А.В. Разнообразие возможных центров силы нового мироустройства // Политическая наука. 2022. № 4. С. 107–120. doi: 10.31249/poln/2022.04.05 Kuznetsov A.V. Variety of possible centers of force in the new world order // Political science (RU). 2022, no. 4, pp. 107–120. doi: 10.31249/poln/2022.04.05 (In Russ.)
- Nye Jr. J.S. What new world order? // Foreign Affairs. 1992, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 83–96. doi: 10.2307/20045126
- Пагани К. Инструментализация миграции: управление миграционными потоками в двустороннем формате // Международные процессы. 2021. Т. 19. № 1(64). С. 103–119. doi: 10.17994/IT.2021.19.1.64.8 Pagani C. Migration statecraft managing migration flows at a bilateral level // International Trends. 2021, vol. 19, no. 1(64), pp. 79–91. doi: 10.17994/IT.2021.19.1.64.14
- Войников В.В. Противодействие инструментализации мигрантов как элемент внешнего измерения иммиграционной политики ЕС // Современная Европа. 2024. № 3. C. 5–16. doi: 10.31857/S020170832403001X Voynikov V.V. Countering the instrumentalization of migrants as an element of the external dimension of EU immigration policy // Contemporary Europe. 2024, no. 3, pp. 5–16. doi: 10.31857/S020170832403001X (In Russ.)
- Цапенко И.П. Внешнеполитические вызовы и инструментализация миграции // Полис. Политические исследования. 2025. № 1. С. 134–148. doi: 10.17976/jpps/2025.01.10 Tsapenko I.P. Challenges of migration for foreign policy and its instrumentalization // Polis. Political Studies. 2025, no. 1, pp. 134–148. doi: 10.17976/jpps/2025.01.10 (In Russ.)
- Greenhill K. Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement, Coercion and Foreign Policy. Ithaca: Cornel University Press, 2010.
- Thiollet H. Migration as diplomacy: labor migrants, refugees, and arab regional politics in the oil-rich countries // International Labor and Working-Cass History. 2011, vol. 79, pp. 103–121. doi: 10.1017/S0147547910000293
- Tsourapas G. Migration diplomacy in the Global South: cooperation, coercion and issue linkage in Gaddafi’s Libya // Third World Quarterly. 2017, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2367–2385. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1350102
- Lavenex S., Uçarer E. The external dimension of europeanization: the case of immigration policies // Cooperation and Conflict. 2004, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 417–443. doi: 10.1177/0010836704047582
- Laube L. Diplomatic side-effects of the EU’s externalization of border control and the emerging role of “transit states” in migration diplomacy // Historical Social Research. 2021, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 78–105. doi: 10.12759/hsr.46.2021.3.78-105
- International Migrant Stock 2024. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/content/international-migrant-stock (дата обращения 15.04.2025).
- Adamson F., Tsourapas G. Migration Diplomacy in World Politics // International Studies Perspectives. 2019, vol. 20, pp. 113–128. doi: 10.1093/isp/eky015
- Mid-Year Trends 2024. 2024, рp.13. https://www.unhcr.org/mid-year-trends-report-2024 (дата обращения 15.04.2025).
- World Development Report 2023. 2023, 315 p. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2023 (дата обращения 15.04.2025).
- Greenhill K. When migrants become weapons. The long history and worrying future of a coercive tactic // Foreign Affairs. 2022. 101, no. 2, pp. 155–164. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/europe/2022-02-22/when-migrants-become-weapons (дата обращения 15.04.2025).
- Adamson F., Greenhill K. Deal-making, diplomacy and transactional forced migration // International Affairs. 2023, vol. 99, pp. 707–725. doi: 10.1093/ia/iiad017
- Tsourapas G. Migration diplomacy in the Middle East and North Africa. Power, mobility, and the state. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2021.
- Haas H., Castles S., Miller M. The age of migration. International population movements in the modern world. Sixth Edition. L.: RED GLOBE PRESs, 2020.
- Micinski N. Threats, deportability and aid: the politics of refugee rentier states and regional stability // Security Dialogue. 2021, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 529–547. doi: 10.1177/09670106211027464
- Lessenich S. Neben uns die Sintflut. Die Externalisierungsgesellschaft und ihr Preis. Berlin: Hanser Verlag, 2016.
- Биссон Л.С. Миграционная дипломатия: взгляд на отношения ЕС и Африки // Современная Европа. 2024. № 6. С. 57–67. doi: 10.31857/S0201708324060056 Bisson L.S. EU‒Africa Relations: Migration Diplomacy Approach // Contemporary Europe. 2024, no. 6, pp. 57–67. doi: 10.31857/S0201708324060056 (In Russ.)
- Migration diplomacy: An analysis of policy approaches and instruments. European Migration Network – OECD joint Inform, 2024. 15 p. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/topics/policy-issues/migration/EMN_OECD_Inform_Migration_Diplomacy_final.pdf (дата обращения 15.04.2025).
- Paasche E. “Recalcitrant” and “uncooperative”: why some countries refuse to accept return of their deportees // Migration Information Source. 2022. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/recalcitrant-uncooperative-countries-refuse-deportation (дата обращения 15.04.2025).
- Cevik S., Padilha T. Measuring Soft Power: A New Global Index // IMF Working Paper. 2024, no. 24/212. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. 21 р. doi: 10.5089/9798400289576.001
- Харитонова Е.М., Бунина А.А. Образование сотрудников как дополнительный показатель географической представленности: дисбаланс в системе ООН // Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. 2025. № 3. В печати. Kharitonova E.M., Bunina A.A. Employee education as an additional indicator of geographical representation: imbalance in the UN system // International Organisations Research Journal. 2025, no. 3. (In Russ.)
- Kaya A. Migration as a leverage tool in international relations: Turkey as a case study // Uluslararasi Iliskiler. 2020, vol. 17, no. 68, pp. 21–39. doi: 10.33458/uidergisi.856870
- Solano G., Huddleston T. Migrant Integration Policy Index 2020. Barcelona/ Brussels: CIDOB and MPG, 2020. https://www.mipex.eu/sites/default/files/downloads/pdf/files/a5/mipex-2020-book-a5.pdf (дата обращения 15.04.2025).
Supplementary files
