On the Inside of Maps: Critical Cartography
- Авторлар: Ivanov K.1, Pisarev A.2, Gavrilenko S.3
-
Мекемелер:
- Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Шығарылым: Том 33, № 1 (2023)
- Беттер: 1-32
- Бөлім: ARTICLES
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/0869-5377/article/view/292560
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/0869-5377-2023-1-1-31
- ID: 292560
Дәйексөз келтіру
Аннотация
The article is devoted to the discussion of the key problems of critical cartography, to which the materials presented in this issue of Logos are devoted. At the beginning the main points of this problematics are outlined by analyzing Buchra Khalili’s art project The Mapping Journey Project (2008–2011). Then the idea of critical cartography is introduced. Firstly, the critique is aimed at the ideas of modern Western common sense and official scientific ideology, first of all professional cartographers themselves, about the map as a neutral and objective representation. Secondly, it is aimed at the ways, contexts and consequences of the production and use of the map in socio-political practices from colonization, wars and the reshaping of social communities to the management of territories, nation-building and routing.
According to critics of cartography, maps record not the landscape as a concrete material reality, but a strictly defined set of relations to this reality, conditioned by social, political, cultural and economic realities. The map is an important part of broader communications and practices. Despite the relative conceptual autonomy of mathematical and technical constructions and actions necessary for the production of the map, it can in no way be considered as something autonomous. It is essentially instrumental, situational and has significance only to the extent that it is part of the broader systems in which it is functionally included. In this sense, the map can be represented as an object in the process of constant formation, it is never ready and always needs to be finalized. The map is the result of the work of many institutions, a large chain of collective actions from data collection and systematization to mathematical processing, layout and circulation. In conclusion, the semiological aspect of maps is discussed: it is defined by the syntagma of the route and the syntagma of the border. Therefore, if the map expresses itself, this statement has two modes — “travel” and “delimitation.”
Негізгі сөздер
Толық мәтін

Авторлар туралы
Konstantin Ivanov
Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: ikv@ihst.ru
Ресей, Moscow
Alexander Pisarev
Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: topisarev@gmail.com
Ресей, Moscow
Stanislav Gavrilenko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: o-s@proc.ru
Ресей, Moscow
Әдебиет тізімі
- Алперс С. Искусство описания. Голландская живопись в XVII веке. М.: V-A-C Press, 2022.
- Берлянт А. М. Картография: учебник. М.: ИД КХУ, 2014.
- Витковский В. Топография. СПб.: Типография Ю. Н. Эрлих, 1904.
- Замятин Д. Онтологии картографии: географическое воображение и планетарность // Логос. 2022. Т. 32. № 6. С. 183–202.
- Каганский В. Неметафора: феноменология картографического изображения // Логос. 2022. Т. 32. № 6. С. 217–244.
- Кант И. О педагогике. 1803 // Собр. соч.: В 8 т. М.: Чоро, 1994. Т. 8.
- Кивельсон В. Картографии царства: Земля и ее значения в России XVII века. М.: НЛО, 2012.
- Кусов В. С. Московское государство XVI — начала XVIII века. Сводный каталог русских географических чертежей. М.: Русскiй мiръ, 2007.
- Кусов В. С. Русский географический чертеж XVI–XVII веков: закономерности развития начального этапа отечественного картографирования. Дисс. в виде науч. докл. … докт. геогр. наук. М.: МГУ, 1996.
- Кусов В. С. Чертежи Земли Русской: Каталог-справочник. М.: Русский мир, 1993.
- Пейнтер Д. Переосмысляя территорию // Городские исследования и практики. 2022. Т. 7. № 2.
- Перек Ж. Просто пространства. Дневник пользователя. СПб.: Издательство Ивана Лимбаха, 2012.
- Писарев А. Картографируя новую материальность: навигационные установки и картины мира // Логос. 2022. Т. 32. № 6. С. 159–182.
- Скотт Д. Благими намерениями государства. Почему и как провалились проекты улучшения человеческой жизни. М.: Университетская книга, 2010.
- Сотникова С. И. Памятники отечественной картографии XVII века // Памятники науки и техники. 1987–1988. Т. 6. М.: Наука, 1989. С. 176–185.
- Страхов К. А. Сталинский джерримендеринг: как Ленинград разделили на районы в 1936 году // Городские исследования и практики. 2022. Т. 7. № 2. С. 35–60.
- Тиц А. А. Загадки древнерусского чертежа. М.: Стройиздат, 1978.
- Яковлев В. О. К вопросу о степени изученности и методологии исследований корпуса русских географических чертежей XVI–XVII веков // Петербургский исторический журнал. 2019. № 3. С. 7–18.
- Barthes R. Elements of Semiology. N.Y.: Hill and Wang, 1986.
- Branch J. The Cartographic State: Maps, Territory, and the Origins of Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA; N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
- Cosgrove D. Apollo’s Eye: A Cartographic Genealogy of the Earth in the Western Imagination. Baltimore; L.: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.
- Cosgrove D. Geography and Vision; Rethinking Maps / M. Dodge, R. Kitchin,
- C. Perkins (eds). L.; N.Y.: Routledge, 2009.
- Cosgrove D. Geography and Vision: Seeing, Imagining and Representing the World. L.; N.Y.: I. B. Tauris, 2008.
- Crampton J. Mapping: A Critical Introduction to Cartography and GIS. Oxford: Willey-Blackwell, 2010.
- Della Dora V. The Mantle of the Earth: Genealogies of a Geographical Metaphor. Chicago; L.: University of Chicago Press, 2020.
- Edney M. H. Cartography: The Ideal and its History. Chicago; L.: University of Chicago Press, 2019.
- Harley B. The New Nature of Maps: Essays in the History of Cartography. Baltimore; L.: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.
- Jacob C. The Sovereign Map: The Theoretical Approaches in Cartography Through History. Chicago; L.: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
- Latour B. Anti-Zoom // Scale in Literature and Culture / M. T. Clarke, D. Wittenber (eds.). L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. P. 93–101.
- Mappings / D. Cosgrove (ed.). L.: Reaktion, 1999.
- Maps: Finding Our Place in the World / J. R. Akerman, R. W. Karrow (eds). Chicago; L.: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
- Nicolaou A. Documenting Migration in Contemporary Art: Bouchra Khalili’s The Mapping Journey Project // Post. Notes on Art in Global Context. 19.2.2020. URL: https://post.moma.org/documenting-migration-in-contemporary-artbouchra-khalilis-the-mapping-journey-project/.
- Pickles J. A History of Spaces: Cartographic Reason, Mapping and the Geo-Coded World. L.; N.Y.: Routledge, 2004.
- The History of Cartography / D. Woodward (ed.). Chicago; L.: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
- The Politics of Mapping / B. Debarbieux, I Hirt (eds). L.: ISTE, 2022.
- The Routledge Handbook of Mapping and Cartography / A. J. Kent, P. Vujakovic (eds). L.; N.Y.: Routledge, 2018.
- This Is Not an Atlas: A Global Collection of Counter-Cartographies / Kollektiv Orangotango+ (eds). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2018.
- Turnbull D. Masons, Tricksters and Cartographers: Comparative Studies in the Sociology of Scientific and Indigenous Knowledge. L.: Routledge, 2003.
- Vaughan L. Mapping Society: The Spatial Dimensions of Social Cartography. L.: UCL Press, 2018.
- Wilmott C. Mobile Mapping Space, Cartography and the Digital. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2020.
- Wood D. Rethinking the Power of Map. L.; N.Y.: The Guilford Press, 2010. P. 111–256.
Қосымша файлдар
