Third Renaissance or The New Middle Ages? Russian Silver Age on the Renaissance
- Авторлар: Matveychev O.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
- Шығарылым: Том 34, № 2 (2024)
- Беттер: 271-286
- Бөлім: PAST
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/0869-5377/article/view/290221
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/0869-5377-2024-2-271-284
- ID: 290221
Дәйексөз келтіру
Аннотация
The article is a historiographical and theoretical review of the views of representatives of Russian religious and philosophical thought of the late 19 — early 20 centuries on the topic of the Western European Renaissance. The article analyzes the history of the concept of “Renaissance” since its introduction into scientific use by Jules Michelet (1855) and Jacob Burckhardt (1860). The Russian intelligentsia took this term in the interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche, who contrasted the individualism and aristocracy of the Renaissance with the egalitarianism and philistinism of modernity. The Nietzschean concept of the Renaissance by Dmitry Merezhkovsky, who sought a solution to the great contradiction between paganism and Christianity and expected a Third Renaissance, is contrasted with the constructions of Akim Volynsky, who interpreted the Renaissance not as a revival of classical beauty and the emancipation of the creative forces of the individual, but as an anti-Christian, demonic movement, the restoration of dark pagan principles. The peculiar interpretations of the Renaissance and related concepts of the Third Renaissance by Thaddeus Zelinsky and Vyacheslav Ivanov are considered.
The author emphasizes that enthusiasts of the Third Renaissance interpret the concept of “Renaissance” broadly — not only as the restoration of ancient ideals, but also as the renewal of culture in general, the path to a new state of culture and society. Hence the idea of the multiplicity of “rebirths” in history, associated with the idea of the cyclical nature of the historical process. It is noted that at the beginning of the 20 century, the attitude to the Renaissance in Russian philosophy is being rethought, the roots of the deepening crisis of modern society are found in it. The Renaissance is criticized as a phenomenon responsible for the desiccation and atomization of Western culture. The most consistent critics of the worldview of the Renaissance type were Nikolai Berdyaev and Pavel Florensky, who announced the imminent end of the Renaissance world, built on the principles of humanism and individualism, and the advent of the New Middle Ages.
Толық мәтін

Авторлар туралы
Oleg Matveychev
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: matveyol@yandex.ru
Ресей, Moscow
Әдебиет тізімі
- Berdyaev N. Novoe srednevekov’e [The New Middle Ages]. Smysl istorii. Novoe srednevekov’e [The Meaning of History. The New Middle Ages], Moscow, Kanon Plus, 2002.
- Berdyaev N. Smysl istorii [The Meaning of History]. Smysl istorii. Novoe srednevekov’e [The Meaning of History. The New Middle Ages], Moscow, Kanon Plus, 2002.
- Berdyaev N. Smysl tvorchestva [The Meaning of the Creative Act]. Filosofiia svobody. Smysl tvorchestva [The Philosophy of Freedom. The Meaning of the Creative Act], Moscow, Pravda, 1989.
- Febvre L. Kak Zhiul’ Mishle otkryl Vozrozhdenie [Comment Jules Michelet Inventa La Renaissance]. Boi za istoriiu [Combats pour l’histoire], Moscow, Nauka, 1991.
- Florensky P. Avtoreferat [Author’s abstract ]. Sochineniia: V 4 tomakh [Works: In 4 Volumes], Moscow, Mysl’, 1994, vol. 1.
- Florensky P. Itogi [Results]. Sochineniia: V 4 tomakh [Works: In 4 Volumes], Moscow, Mysl’, 2000, vol. 3 (1), Obraz i slovo [Image and Word].
- Florensky P. Kul’turno-istoricheskoe mesto i predposylki khristianskogo miroponimaniia [Cultural and Historical Place and Prerequisites of the Christian Worldview]. Sochineniia: V 4 tomakh [Works: In 4 Volumes], Moscow, Mysl’, 2000, vol. 3 (2), U vodorazdelov mysli [By the Watersheds of Thought].
- Florensky P. Ob ontologichnosti. K lektsiiam [On Ontology. To Lectures]. Sochineniia: V 4 tomakh [Works: In 4 Volumes], Moscow, Mysl’, 2000, vol. 3 (2), U vodorazdelov mysli [By the Watersheds of Thought].
- Florensky P. Stolp i utverzhdenie Istiny. Opyt pravoslavnoi teoditsei [The Pillar and Ground of the Truth: An Essay in Orthodox Theodicy in Twelve Letters], Moscow, AST, 2003.
- Gippius Z. “Inturisty” u fashistov [“Intourists” Among Fascists]. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works], Moscow, Dmitry Sechin, 2012, vol. 13 U nas v Parizhe: Literaturnaia i politicheskaia publitsistika 1928–1939. Vospominaniia. Portrety [Here in Paris: Literary and political journalism 1928-1939. Memories. Portraits].
- Hegel G. W. F. Lektsii po filosofii istorii [Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Weltgeschichte], Saint-Petersburg, Nauka, 1993.
- Maksimov D. Zhurnaly rannego simvolizma [Journals of Early Symbolism]. In: Evgeniev-Maksimov V., Maksimov D. Iz proshlogo russkoi zhurnalistiki. Stat’i i materialy [From the Past of Russian Journalism. Articles and Materials], Leningrad, Writers’ Publishing House in Leningrad, 1930.
- Merezhkovsky D. O simvolizme “Dafnisa i Khloi” [On the Symbolism of “Daphnis and Chloe”]. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete Works], Moscow, Printing House of the I. D. Sytin Partnership, 1914, vol. XIX.
- Nietzsche F. Pis’ma [Letters], Moscow, Kul’turnaia revoliutsiia, 2007.
- Trubetskoy S. Uchenie o Logose v ego istorii [The Doctrine of the Logos in His History]. Sochineniia [Works], Mysl’, 1994.
- Volynsky A. Leonardo da Vinchi [Leonardo da Vinci], Kiev, S. V. Kulzhenko Printing House, 1909.
- Zielinski F. Istoriia antichnykh religii: V 3 tomakh [The History of ancient religions: In 3 volumes], Saint-Petersburg, Quadrivium, Aletheia, 2014.
- Zielinski F. Iz zhizni idei [From the Life of Ideas], Saint-Petersburg, M. M. Stasyulevich Printing House, 1907, vol. 3 Soperniki khristianstva [Rivals of Christianity].
- Zielinski F. Kharakter antichnoi religii v sravnenii s khristianstvom [The Character of Ancient Religion in Comparison with Christianity]. Iz zhizni idei [From the Life of Ideas], Saint-Petersburg, M. M. Stasyulevich Printing House, 1911, vol. 2 Drevnii mir i my [The Ancient World and us].
- Zielinski F. Pamiati I. F. Annenskogo [In Memory of I. F. Annensky]. Iz zhizni idei [From the Life of Ideas], Saint-Petersburg, M. M. Stasyulevich Printing House, 1911, vol. 2 Drevnii mir i my [The Ancient World and us].
Қосымша файлдар
