Enacting technoscience: art & science from the contemporary metaphysics perspective
- Авторлар: Alekhina A.1, Pisarev A.2
-
Мекемелер:
- National Research University — Higher School of Economics (HSE University)
- Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Science (RAS)
- Шығарылым: Том 34, № 1 (2024)
- Беттер: 131-176
- Бөлім: ARTICLES
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/0869-5377/article/view/290196
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/0869-5377-2024-1-131-172
- ID: 290196
Дәйексөз келтіру
Аннотация
In the article the assumptions, strategies and possibilities of Art & Science (A&S) are considered through the prism of three types of metaphysical thinking. These types are defined by the answers to the question: why is there something rather than nothing. Thus, the analysis of classical metaphysics makes it possible to identify the basic assumptions of many A&S projects. These assumptions are borrowed by art from the public self-presentation of science and from Western common sense: there is an autonomous and definite nature, it is successfully known and mastered by science. So nature is nature, and nothing more. These assumptions are disputed by post-Kantian transcendental ontology. It opens up for A&S the opportunity to reflect upon the givenness of nature in the experience mediated by science, namely the constitution of science’s own objectivity, the social and political factors involved, as well as naturalization processes that turn scientific objects into nature things by way of erasing their origin. Nature is in the eye of the beholder. Empirical metaphysics (a number of projects from STS) sheds light on laboratory practices of nature enactment and the role of non-human actors in these processes. Nature is not only in the eye of the beholder, but also in the hands of the doer. It is assembled gathers, among other things, from the tissues of society, politics, culture, so does not oppose them from the outside. Among other things, this move allows us to define Art & Science as the enactment or performance of technoscience, since the laboratory-technical aesthetics inherent in this art is a reenactment of the part of the technoscientific network of practices and actors.
In conclusion, by means of Pierre Bourdieu’s critical sociology, a hypothesis is formulated explaining why an alliance with STS may be problematic for A&S artists, and why posthumanism and new materialism are assimilated in this art in a cliched form. The technoscientifically formed world requires technoscientific enlightenment based on STS and philosophy, and A&S in alliance with them can be its art.
Негізгі сөздер
Толық мәтін

Авторлар туралы
Anastasia Alekhina
National Research University — Higher School of Economics (HSE University)
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: aalekhina@hse.ru
Ресей, Moscow
Alexander Pisarev
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Science (RAS)
Email: topisarev@gmail.com
Ресей, Moscow
Әдебиет тізімі
- Avanessian A. Metafizika segodnja [Metaphysik zur Zeit], Moscow, V–A–C Press, 2019.
- Bloor D. Anti-Latur [Anti-Latour]. Logos (Russia), 2017, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 85–134.
- Bloor D. Sil’naia programma v sotsiologii znaniia [The Strong Programme in the Sociology of Knowledge]. Logos (Russia), 2002, vol. 12, no. 5–6, pp. 162–185.
- Bourdieu P. Za ratsionalisticheskii istorizm [Pour un historicisme rationaliste]. Sotsio-Logos postmodernizma ’97 [Socio-Logos of Postmodernism ’97], Moscow, Institute of Experimental Sociology, 1996.
- Brassier R. Poniatiia i ob”ekty [Concepts and Objects]. Logos (Russia), 2017, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 227–262.
- Bulatov D. Iskusstvo kak predpolagaemoe vozmozhnoe [Art as the Conjectured Possible]. Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal [Artistic Journal], 2018, no. 106, pp. 98–109.
- Bulatov D. Koevoliutsiia, izbytok, destabilizatsiia. O sovremennykh strategiiakh v oblasti science art [Coevolution, Excess, Destabilization. On Modern Strategies in the Field of Science Art]. Logos (Russia), 2006, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 4–19.
- Carnap R. Preodolenie metafiziki logicheskim analizom iazyka [Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache]. Vestnik MGU. Seriia 7: Filosofiia [The Moscow University Herald. Series 7. Philosophy], 1993, no. 6, pp. 11–26.
- Chukhrov K. Zlo, izbytok, vlast’: tri mediuma iskusstva [Evil, Surplus, Power: The Three Media of Art]. Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal [Artistic Journal], 2021, no. 119, pp. 108–121.
- Daston L. Against Nature, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2019.
- Dear P. Istoriei chego iavliaetsia istoriia nauki? Istoki ideologii sovremennoi nauki v rannee Novoe vremia [What Is the History of Science the History Of? Early Modern Roots of the Ideology of Modern Science]. Logos (Russia), 2020, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 29–62.
- Drucker J. Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 2011, vol. 5, no. 1. Available at: https://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html.
- Fedorova N. Modeli dlia novogo starogo budushchego [Models for the Old New Future]. Versus, 2022, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 89–110.
- Gavrilenko S., Pisarev A. V poiskakh uskol’zaiushchego ob”ekta: nauka i ee istoriia [In Search of an Evanescent Object: Science and Its History]. Logos (Russia), 2020, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–28.
- Geertz C. Zdravyi smysl kak kul’turnaia sistema [Common Sense as a Cultural System]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, 2007, no. 4, pp. 19–42.
- Hacking I. Predstavlenie i vmeshatel’stvo. Vvedenie v filosofiiu estestvennykh nauk [Representing and Intervening. Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science], Moscow, Logos, 1998.
- Haraway D. Situativnye znaniia: vopros o nauke v feminizme i preimushchestvo chastichnoi perspektivy [Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial. Perspective]. Logos (Russia), 2022, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 237–271.
- Heidegger M. Chto takoe metafizika [Was ist Metaphysik?], Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt, 2013.
- Heidegger M. Kant i problema metafiziki [Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik], Moscow, Logos, 1997.
- Heidegger M. Vremia i bytie [Zeit und Sein]. Vremia i bytie: st. i vystup. [Zeit und Sein: Articles and Speeches], Moscow, Respublika, 1993, pp. 391–406.
- Inishev I. Sil’nye storony slabogo transtsendentalizma [The Strengths of Weak Transcendentalism]. Praktizatsiia filosofii. Sovremennye tendentsii i strategii [Practicing Philosophy. Current Trends and Strategies] (eds I. Inishev, T. Shchittsova), Vilnius, European Humanities University, 2010, vol. 2, pp. 165–178.
- Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma [Kritik der reinen Vernunft]. Sobr. soch.: V 8 t. [Collected Works: In 8 vols], Moscow, Choro, 1994, vol. 3.
- Koyré A. Ot mira “priblizitel’nosti” k universumu pretsizionnosti [Du monde de l’à peu près à l’univers de la précision]. Ocherki istorii filosofskoi mysli. O vliianii filosofskikh kontseptsii na razvitie nauchnykh teorii [Essays on the History of Philosophical Thought: On the Influence of Philosophical Concepts on the Development of Scientific Theories], Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2002, pp. 109–127.
- Kralechkin D. Fundamental’noe razlichie bytiia i sushchego kak sposob obosnovaniia ontologii [Fundamental Difference of Being and Entities as a Way of Justification Ontology]. A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for a Candidate degree in Philosophy. Moscow, Moscow State University, 2002.
- Kulik I. Oblaka i kristally [Clouds and Crystals]. ARTkhronika [Art Chronicle], July 27, 2012. Available at: http://artchronika.ru/vystavki/clouds-and-crystals/.
- Latour B. Devidu Bluru… i ne tol’ko: otvet na “Anti-Latur” Devida Blura [For David Bloor and Beyond]. Logos (Russia), 2017, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 135–162.
- Latour B. Nadezhdy konstruktivizma [The Promises of Constructivism]. Sotsiologiia veshchei: sb. st. [The Sociology of Things: collected articles], Moscow, Territoriia budushchego, 2006, pp. 365–389.
- Latour B. On the Partial Existence of Existing and Nonexisting Objects. Biographies of Scientific Objects (ed. L. Daston), Chicago, London, The University of Chicago Press, 2000.
- Latour B. Peresborka sotsial’nogo. Vvedenie v aktorno-setevuiu teoriiu [Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory], Moscow, HSE Publishing House, 2014.
- Latour B. Pochemu vydokhlas’ kritika? Ot faktov k voprosam, vyzyvaiushchim ozabochennost' [Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern]. Logos (Russia), 2023, vol. 33, no. 5.
- Latour B. Politiki prirody. Kak privit’ naukam demokratiiu [Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy], Moscow, Ad Marginem Press, 2018.
- Latour B. Vizualizatsiia i poznanie: izobrazhaia veshchi vmeste [Visualization and Cognition: Drawing Things Together]. Logos (Russia), 2017, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 95–156.
- Law J. Optika oprosa [Seeong Lika a Survey]. Sotsiologiia vlasti [The Sociology of Power], 2012, no. 4–5, pp. 218–243.
- Law J. Posle metoda: besporiadok i sotsial’naia nauka [After Method: Mess in Social Science Research], Moscow, Gaidar Institute Press, 2015.
- Law J., Lien M. E. Slippery: Field Notes in Empirical Ontology. Social Studies of Science, 2013, no. 43, pp. 363–378.
- Meillassoux Q. Posle konechnosti. Esse o neobkhodimosti kontingentnosti [Apres la finitude. Essai sur la necessite de la contingence], Ekaterinburg, Moscow, Kabinetnyi uchenyi, 2016.
- Miller A. Speculative Grace. Bruno Latour and Object-Oriented Theology, New York, Fordham University Press, 2013.
- Mol A. Eating in Theory, Durham, Duke University Press, 2021.
- Mol A. Mnozhestvennoe telo. Ontologiia v meditsinskoi praktike [The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice], Perm, Hyle Press, 2017.
- Nauka i nauchnost’ v istoricheskoi perspektive [Science and Scientifical in Historical Perspective] (eds D. Aleksandrov, M. Khagner), Saint Petersburg, EUPRESS, 2007.
- Packer J. Abstract Materialism: Peter Galison Discusses Foucault, Kittler, and the History of Science and Technology. International Journal of Communication, 2016, no. 10, pp. 3160–3173.
- Pisarev A. Kartografiruia novuiu material’nost’: navigatsionnye ustanovki i kartiny mira [Mapping New Materiality: Navigational Dispositions and Worldview]. Logos (Russia), 2022, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 159–182.
- Pisarev A. STS i vozmozhnoe budushchee muzeia nauki: k novoi kunstkamere [STS and the Possible Future of the Science Museum: Towards a New Kunstkammer]. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noi semiotiki [ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics], 2021, no. 4 (30), pp. 131–185.
- Rheinberger H. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 1997, ch. 5, 7.
- Shapin S. Kak byt’ antinauchnymi [How to Be Antiscientific]. Logos (Russia), 2020, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 159–185.
- Żmijewski A. Prikladnoe sotsial'noe iskusstvo [Applied Social Art]. Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal [Artistic Journal], 2017, no. 67–68. Available at: https://mam.garagemca.org/issue/25/article/387.
Қосымша файлдар
