City Imaginary Boundaries
- Authors: Fedotova N.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University
- Issue: Vol 36, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 74-91
- Section: Social practices
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/0236-2007/article/view/316613
- ID: 316613
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The problem of city perception through imagined boundaries is analyzed. The city is considered as а space, that a person imagines and experiences thorough a continuum of meanings, formed by a set of ideas about urban space and time. This study focuses on urban imaginary boundaries that are formed based on urban imaginary functioning patterns. The author draws on the scientific statements of B. Anderson, who identified the collective imaginary concept, E. Soja, who demonstrated that a city is represented as both real and imagine by a person, and A. Lefebvre, who suggested that a person experience the city on the base of the imaginary. Urban imaginary boundaries are the semantic facets that symbolically encode what the city and the non-city is based on citizens’ ideas. In the article two vectors of urban imaginary boundaries’ structuring are revealed: 1) through identifications codes, setting the distinction “one’s own” and “others”, including through belonging to the urban space, and providing an imaginary belonging for people, who are unfamiliar with each other, to citizens and to the city; 2) through the urban imaginary’s temporal aspect, revealed in the culture city memory categories that define the structure of collective ideas about a city through images of the city’s past. To the non-city, which is outside the imaginary boundaries, the author refers to all those urban space objects and practices that are not symbolically and mentally related to citizens’ urban ideas.
About the authors
N. G. Fedotova
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: fedotova75@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4225-3666
Russian Federation, 41 Bol’shaya Sankt-Peterburgskaya Str., Veliky Novgorod 173003
References
- Avanesov S.S. Gorodskoe prostranstvo kak antropologicheskii fenomen [Urban Space As Anthropological Phenomenon]. Praksema. Problemy vizualnoi semiotiki. 2018. N 2(16). P. 10–31. doi: 10.23951/2312-7899-2018-2-10-31
- Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshlenie ob istokax i rasprostranenii natsionalizma [Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism], transl. from Engl. by V. Nikolaev; introd. art. by S.P. Bankovskaya. Moscow: KANON-press-TS: Kuchkovo pole Publ., 2001.
- Vakhshtain V. Voobrazhaya gorod: Vvedenie v teoriyu kontseptualizatsii [Imagining a City: An Introduction to the Theory of Conceptualization]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ., 2022.
- Veselkova N.V., Pryamikova E.V., Vandyshev M.N. Mesta pamyati v molodykh gorodakh: Monografiya [The Places of Memory in the Young Towns: Monograph]. Ekaterinburg: Urals University Publ., 2016.
- Wirth L. Urbanizm kak obraz zhizni [Urbanism Аs a Way of Life], transl. from Engl. by V.G. Nikolaev. Wirth L. Izbrannye raboty po sotsiologii [Selected Works in Sociology]. Moscow: INION RAN Publ., 2005. P. 93–118.
- Voronova S.A. Fenomen voploshсhennogo kul’turnogo landshafta v konstruirovanii regional’noi identichnosti (na primere Staritskogo vernakulyarnogoraiona) [The Embodied Cultural Landscape Phenomenon in the Construction of Regional Identity (On the Example of the Staritsky Vernacular District)]. Nasledie i sovremennost’. 2022. N 5(2). P. 144–154. DOI: 10.52883/
- -0214-2022-5-2-144-154
- Gorelova Yu.R. Gorod kak kontsept i vizual’no-khudozhestvennyi obraz [The City As a Concept and Visual-Artistic Image]. Urbanistika. 2018. N 1. P. 74–89. doi: 10.7256/2310-8673.2018.1.24086
- Gornova G.V., Fedyaev D.M. Gorod v labirinte otrazhenii: ot remeslennogo obraztsa k obrazu goroda [The City in a Labyrinth of Reflections: From a Craft Sample to an Image of the City]. Praksema. Problemy vizualnoi semiotiki. 2022. N 1(31). P. 12–23. doi: 10.23951/2312-7899-2022-1-12-23
- Dahin A.V. Gorod kak mesto pamyatovaniya [The City As a Place of Remembrance]. Analitika kul’turologii. 2011. N 1(19). P. 167–173.
- Zamyatin D.N. Postgeografiya goroda: strategii prostranstvennogo voobrazheniya. Gorod v teorii [Postgeography of the City: Strategies of Spatial Imagination. A City in Theory]. Voprosy mestnogo samoupravleniya. 2013. N 6(52). P. 33–34.
- Zamyatin D.N. Prostranstvo i geterotopiya: k semiotike metageograficheskogo voobrazheniya [Space and Heterotopy: To Semiotics of Metageographic Imagination]. Chelovek: Obraz i sushchnost’. Gumanitarnye aspekty. 2020. N 1(41). P. 29–52. doi: 10.31249/chel/2020.01.02
- Kazakova G.M. “Vernakulyarnyi raion” kak uslovie intensifikatsii sotsial’nykh protsessov [“The Vernacular Area” As Condition for the Intensification of Social Processes]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. N 9. P. 57–65. doi: 10.7868/S0132162517090070
- Kireeva O.V. Granitsy goroda — granitsy kul’tury: rossiiskie realii [City Boundaries — Culture Boundaries: Russian Realities]. Vestnik SPbGUKI. 2014. N 4(21). P. 14–18.
- Kolosov V.A. Issledovaniya granits v sovremennom mire: progress teorii i osnovnye napravleniya [Border Studies in the Contemporary World: Progress in Theory and Main Directions]. Regional’nye issledovaniya. 2022. N 3. P. 23–36.
- Korzhkov G. Territorial’nye identichnosti: kontseptual’nye interpretatsii v sovremennoi zarubezhnoi sotsiologicheskoi mysli [Territorial Identity: A Conceptual Interpretation in Modern Foreign Sociological Thought]. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing. 2010. N 1. P. 107–124.
- Kuznetsov A.G. Chikagskaya shkola sotsiologii goroda: k identichnosti cherez granitsy [Chicago School of Urban Sociology: To the Identity Across Borders]. Sotsiologiya goroda. 2010. N 3. P. 54–59.
- Kulikova T.V. Filosofiya “granitsy” v kontekste gumanitarnogo poznaniya [The Philosophical Meaning of the Border in the Context of Humanitarian Cognition]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta imeni N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2012. N 1(3). P. 47–54.
- Lefebvre H. Pravo na gorod [The Right to the City], transl. from French by D. Savosin. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya. 2023. N 24(1). P. 55–70.
- Linch K. Obraz goroda [The Image of the City], transl. from Engl. by V.L. Glazychev. Moscow: Stroiizdat Publ., 1982.
- Nikolaeva Zh.V. Cherta identichnosti: stanovlenie goroda [The Identity Feature: The Emergence of the City]. Zhurnal frontirnykh issledovanii. 2021. N 1(6). P. 144–159. doi: 10.46539/jfs.v6i1.258
- Nikolaeva Zh.V., Troitskaya А.А. Diskurs ob identichnosti kak sposob osmysleniya gorodskogo prostranstva [Discourse on Identity As a Way of Understanding Urban Space]. Zhurnal frontirnykh issledovanii. 2020. N 1. P. 11–28. doi: 10.24411/2500-0225-2020-10001
- Augé М. Ne-mesta. Vvedenie v antropologiyu gipermoderna [Non-Places. Introduction to an Anthropology of Sypermodernity], transl. from French by A.U. Kononov. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ., 2017.
- Pavlyk S.G. Gorodskaya lokal’naya toponimiya kak indikator prostranstvennoi samoorganizatsii obshchestva [Urban Local Toponymy As an Indicator of Spatial Self-Organization of Society]. Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki. 2017. Vol. 2, N 2. P. 33–42.
- Paramonova V.A. “Tsentr — periferiya” kak simvolicheskaya dixotomiya gorodskogo prostranstva [“Center — Periphery” As a Symbolic Dichotomy of City Environment]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Series 7. Filosofiya. 2009. N 1(9). P. 126–130.
- Park R. Gorodskoe soobshchestvo kak prostranstvennaya konfiguratsiya i moral’nyi poryadok [The Urban Community As a Spatial Pattern and a Moral Order], transl. from Engl. by V. Nikolaev. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2006. Vol. 5, N 1. P. 11–18.
- Piskunova А.Е. Gorodskoe prostranstvo kak konstrukt vospriyatiya: antropologicheskaya razmernost’ Novokuznetska [Urban Space As a Construct of Perception: The Anthropological Dimension of Novokuznetsk]. Tomskii zhurnal lingvisticheskikh i antropologicheskikh issledovanii. 2022. N 1(35). P. 146–156. doi: 10.23951/2307-6119-2022-1-146-156
- Siddi N. Nevidimye granitsy v gorode [The Invisible Boundaries in the City]. Zhurnal frontirnykh issledovanii. 2021. N 1. P. 160–169. doi: 10.46539/jfs.v6i1.257
- Tolochko A.V. Osobennosti vospriyatiya gorodskoi sredy [Features Perception of the Urban Environment]. Vestnik Polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya F. Stroitel’stvo. Prikladnye nauki. 2023. N 2(34). P. 55–62.
- Troitskaya А.А. Markiruya mesto: rol’ pustyh prostranstv v mental’nykh granitsakh goroda (na primere ust’ya reki Smolenki) [Marking a Place: The Role of Void Spaces in the Mental Boundaries of a City (On the Example of the Smolenka River Mouth)]. Zhurnal frontirnykh issledovanii. 2020. N. 4. P. 344–381.
- Trufanova E.O. Privatnoe i publichnoe v tsifrovom prostranstve: razmyvanie granits [Private and Public in the Digital Space: Blurring of the Lines]. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies. 2021. N 3(1). P. 14–38. doi: 10.46539/gmd.v3i1.130
- Urlich P., Troitskii S. Slozhnost’ “granits”: postanovka problemy, terminologiya i klassifikatsiya [The Complexity of “Borders”: Research Agendas, Terminology and Classification]. Zhurnal frontirnykh issledovanii. 2019. N 4.2(16). P. 234–256.
- Fedotova N.G. Kulturnaya pamyat’ goroda: sovremennye praktiki simvolizatsii proshlogo [City’s Cultural Memory: Modern Practices of Symbolizing the Past]. Observatoriya kultury. 2021. Vol. 4, N 18. P. 352–364. doi: 10.25281/2072-3156-2021-18-4-352-364
- Fedotova N.G. Urban imaginary: vizual’nye markery gorodskogo voobrazhaemogo [Visual Markers of the Urban Imaginary]. Praksema. Problemy vizualnoi semiotiki. 2020. N 1(23). P. 121–139. doi: 10.23951/2312-7899-2020-1-121-139
- Khaibulina E.I. Formy i sushchnost’ predstavlenii: psikhologicheskii podhod [Forms and Essence of Representations: Psychological Approach]. Izvestiya YuFU. Texnicheskie nauki. 2013. N 10(147). P. 218–224.
- Shabaev Yu.P., Sadokhin A.P., Labunova O.V., Sazonova N.N. Antropologicheskoe ponimanie goroda i metodologiya urbanisticheskogo izucheniya [Anthropological Understanding of the City and Urban Research Methodology]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny. 2018. N 3. P. 248–267. doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.3.13
- Çinar A., Bender T. Urban Imaginaries: Locating the Modern City. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.
- Delorme P. De l’école de Chicago à l’imaginaire urbain. Ville autrement. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec, 2005. P. 9–27.
- Hale R.N. Map of Vernacular Regions in America. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1971.
- Hauge А.L. Identity and Place — A Comparison of Three Identity Theories. Architectural Science Review. 2007. Vol. 50(1). P. 44–51.
- Lalli M. Urban-Related Identity. Theory, Measurement and Empirica Findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1992. Vol. 12, N 4. P. 285–303.
- Lamont M. Culture and Identity. Handbook of Sociological Theory, J.H. Turner (ed.). New York: Kluwer Academic: Plenum Publ., 2002. P. 171–185.
- Paasi A. Problematizing “Bordering, Ordering, and Othering” As Manifestations of Socio-Spatial Fetishism. Tijdschrift voor Economishe en Sociale Geografie. 2021. Vol. 112(1). P. 18–25.
- Schwenk J. Soziales Imaginäres und Stadtforschung. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 2019. Vol. 44(S2). P. 99–115. doi: 10.1007/s11614-019-00375-y
- Scott J.W. Introduction: Bordering, Ordering, Othering (Almost) Twenty Years on. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. 2020. Vol. 112(1). P. 1–8.
- Soja E.W. Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Blackwell Publ., 2000.
- Tuan Y.-F. Images and Mental Maps. Annals of the Assocition of American Geographers. 1975. Vol. 65(2). P. 205–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1975.tb01031.x
