Specific features of the state support mechanism for agriculture in Azerbaijan
- Authors: Gojamanov J.1
-
Affiliations:
- Department of Economics, Baku State University
- Issue: No 6 (2025)
- Pages: 63-75
- Section: ECONOMIC POLICY
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/0207-3676/article/view/314727
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207367625060057
- ID: 314727
Abstract
Keywords
About the authors
J. Gojamanov
Department of Economics, Baku State University
Email: gojamanovjavid@gmail.com
Baku, Republic of Azerbaijan
References
- Прохоренко П. Потенциал молочного скота // Животноводство Росии. 2005. № 1. С. 29–31.
- Указ Президента Азербайджанской Республики № 759 от 27.06.2019 г. «О создании нового механизма субсидирования в аграрном секторе».
- Указ Президента Азербайджанской Республики от 19.12.2018 г. № 413 «Об совершенствовании государственной поддержки сельского хозяйства и лизинговой деятельности в аграрном секторе».
- Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries. A posıtıve reform agenda OECD. Paris: OECD Publications, 2002, 41 p.
- Bieling C., Plieninger T. Recording manifestations of cultural ecosystem services in the landscape // Landscape Research. 2013. 38 (5). P. 649–667.
- Cerroni S. Eliciting farmers’ subjective probabilities, risk, and uncertainty preferences using contextualized field experiments // Agricultural Economics. 2020. 51. P. 707–724.
- Erjavec E., Lovec M. Research of European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy: disciplinary boundaries and beyond // European Review of Agricultural Economics. 2017. 44. P. 732–754.
- Finger R., El Benni N. Farm income in European agriculture: new perspectives on measurement and implications for policy evaluation // European Review of Agricultural Economics. 2021. 8 (2). P. 253–265.
- Fitton N., Alexander P., Arnell N., Bajzelj B., Calvin K., Doelman J., Gerber J.S., Havlik P., Hasegawa T., et al. The vulnerabilities of agricultural land and food production to future water scarcity // Global Environmental Change. 2019. 58. 101944.
- Helfand S.M., Taylor M.P. The inverse relationship between farm size and productivity: Refocusing the debate // 2017 Pacific Conference for Development Economics Riverside. Cali- fornia. 2017.
- Huang, Z., Du, X., Castillo, C.S.Z. How does urbanization affect farmland protection? // Evidence from China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2019. 145. P. 139–147.
- Iyer P., Bozzola M., Hirsch S., Meraner M., Finger R. Measuring farmer risk preferences in Europe: a systematic review // Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2020. 71. P. 3–26.
- Larson D., Matsumoto T., KilicT., Otsuka K. Should African rural development strategies depend on smallholder farms? An exploration of the inverse-productivity hypothesis // Agricultural Economics 2014. 45(3). P. 55–67.
- Matthews A. Greening agricultural payments in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy // Bio-based and Applied Economics. 2013. 2. P. 1–27.
- OECD´s Producer Support Estimated and related indicators of agricultural support. Concepts, Calculations, Interpretation and Use (The PSE Manual). Paris: OECD Publications. 2016. 194 p.
- Otsuka K., Liu Y, Yamauchi F. The future of small farms in Asia // Development Policy Review. 2016. 34(3). P. 441–461.
- Swinton S.M., Lupi F., Robertson G.P., Hamilton, S.K. Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecological Economics. 2007. 64. P. 245–252. URL: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RL
- URL: https://www.maliyye.gov.az
- URL: https://www.stat.gov.az
- URL: https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/ag_e.htm
