METHODS OF APPLICATION OF PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER: IN STOCK OR ANNUALLY?
- Authors: Kolbin S.A.1,2, Tkachenko G.I.1, Danilova A.A.1,3, Rakhlenko A.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- Siberian Federal Scientific Center of Agro-Bio Technologies RAS
- Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry, SB of RAS
- Siberian Research Institute of Plant Cultivation and Breeding – Branch of Institute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS
- Issue: No 9 (2025)
- Pages: 25-33
- Section: Fertilizers
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/0002-1881/article/view/318995
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034496425090038
- ID: 318995
Cite item
Abstract
Optimization of the use of limited raw materials for the production of phosphorous fertilizers is recognized as the most important problem of our time. Substantiation of the dose and method of application of phosphorus fertilizer (PF), correction of the technology of its application are one of the ways to solve this problem. The effectiveness of the annual and reserve methods of applying PF to soils with different phosphate stocks was compared. The soil is old–arable leached medium-acre chernozem. The soil was sampled in the Central forest-steppe of the Novosibirsk region. on 2 sites, which differed in the composition of the soil-forming rocks and, accordingly, in the amount of phosphate stock. In soil 1, the total phosphorus content was 1.4 times higher than in soil 2, and the Ca-PIII fraction was about 2 times higher with lower Ca-PII fraction values. The soils are highly humic, with a content of exchangeable potassium up to 140 mg/kg, mobile phosphorus (according to Chirikov) – up to 215 mg/kg. In the vegetation experiment, 5 cycles of spring wheat cultivation were carried out before the earing phase in the KKR-001 artificial climate chamber. Experience options: N50K50 (background), N50K50 + P40 (single use), N50K50 + P40+40+40 (annual deposit), N50K50 + +P120 (stock deposit). The biomass of wheat during the application of P40+40+40 in cycle 3 was about 20% higher than that of P120, so the phosphorus deposited in the reserve was immobilized by the soil. Phosphorus removal in cycles 1 and 2, when adding P120 to the reserve, exceeded the other options by about 50%, in cycle 3 it was 30% less than the option P40+40+40, so the potential for adding phosphorus to the reserve by the end of cycle 3 was exhausted. In cycles 4 and 5, with a significant decrease in the removal of the element, the differences between the variants were leveled. The utilization rate of phosphorus fertilizer was maximal in cycle 1 and decreased significantly (by 2–3 times) in subsequent cycles, regardless of the method of its application and the soil. When studying the effect of fertilizers (1–3 growing cycles), an increase in the phosphorus content in the mobile fractions of the soil was observed, an increase in the number of CFU phosphatemobilizing microorganisms with suppression of phosphatase activity. It was concluded that, regardless of the soil properties, in order to increase the economic efficiency of agrocenosis, it is advisable to apply РF annually (to provide plants with phosphorus), to increase the soil’s phosphorus supply, the studied methods of applying fertilizers were equivalent and ineffective.
About the authors
S. A. Kolbin
Siberian Federal Scientific Center of Agro-Bio Technologies RAS; Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry, SB of RAS
Email: Danilova7alb@yandex.ru
Tsentralnaya ul., 26, Novosibirsk region, r.p. Krasnoobsk 633501, Russia; prosp. Lavrentieva 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
G. I. Tkachenko
Siberian Federal Scientific Center of Agro-Bio Technologies RAS
Email: Danilova7alb@yandex.ru
Tsentralnaya ul., 26, Novosibirsk region, r.p. Krasnoobsk 633501, Russia
A. A. Danilova
Siberian Federal Scientific Center of Agro-Bio Technologies RAS; Siberian Research Institute of Plant Cultivation and Breeding – Branch of Institute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS
Email: Danilova7alb@yandex.ru
Tsentralnaya ul., 26, Novosibirsk region, r.p. Krasnoobsk 633501, Russia; ul. C-100 21, Novosibirsk region r.p., Krasnoobsk 630501, Russia
A. G. Rakhlenko
Siberian Federal Scientific Center of Agro-Bio Technologies RAS
Author for correspondence.
Email: Danilova7alb@yandex.ru
Tsentralnaya ul., 26, Novosibirsk region, r.p. Krasnoobsk 633501, Russia
References
- Van Vuuren D.P., Bouwman A.F., Beusen A.H. Phosphorus demand for the 1970–2100 period: a scenario analysis of resource depletion // Global Environ. Change. 2010. V. 20(3). P. 428–439. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.004
- Yu X., Keitel C., Dijkstra F.A. Global analysis of phosphorus fertilizer use efficiency in cereal crops // Global Food Security. 2021. V. 29. 100545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100545
- Li B., Ng S.J., Han J.-С., Li M., Zeng J., Guo D., Zhou Y., He Z., Wu X., Huang Y. Network evolution and risk assessment of the global phosphorus trade // Sci. Total Environ. 2023. V. 860. № 20. 160433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160433
- Tilman D., Balzer C., Hill J., Befort B.L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture // Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am. 2011. V. 108(50). P. 20260–20264. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108
- McDowell R.W., Pletnyakov P., Haygarth P.M. Phosphorus applications adjusted to optimal crop yields can help sustain global phosphorus reserves // Nat. Food. 2024. V. 5. P. 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-024-00952-9
- Колбин С.А., Данилова А.А., Рахленко А.Г. Оптимальные дозы фосфорных удобрений для зерновых агроценозов Приобья // Агрохимия. 2024. № 8. С. 19–26. https://doi.org 10.31857/S0002188124080032
- Sattari S.Z., Bouwman A.F., Martinez Rodrı´guez R., Beusen A.H.W., van Ittersum M.K. Negative global phosphorus budgets challenge sustainable intensification of grasslands // Nat. Commun. 2016. V. 7(1). P. 10696. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10696
- Hu W., Li С.-h., Ye C., Wang J., Wei W., Deng Y. Research progress on ecological models in the field of water eutrophication: CiteSpace analysis based on data from the ISI web of science database // Ecol. Model. 2019. V. 410. 108779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108779
- Moal M.L., Gascuel-Odoux C., Ménesguen A., Souchon Y., Étrillard C., Levain A., Moatar F., Pannard A., Philippe Souchu P., Lefebvre A., Gilles Pinay G. Eutrophication: A new wine in an old bottle? // Sci. Total Environ. 2019. V. 651. P. 1–11.
- Волынкина О.В., Волынкин В.И., Кириллова Е.В., Копылов А.Н. Системы удобрения в агротехнологиях Зауралья. Куртамыш: ООО «Куртамышская типография», 2017. 284 с.
- Агрохимические методы исследования почв. М.: Наука, 1975. 656 с.
- Николов Н.A. 9-th World Fertilizer Congress Proceedings. Budapest, 1984. P. 274.
- Методические указания по отбору проб растений, определению в них азота, фосфора и калия. М.: ЦИНАО, 1980. 55 с.
- Сорокин О.Д. Прикладная статистика на компьютере. Новосибирск: СО РАСХН, 2008. 217 с.
- Ткаченко Г.И. Методы почвенной диагностики фосфорного питания в Новосибирском При- обье // Сибир. вестн. с.-х. науки. 2024. № 12. C. 15–21. doi: 10.26898/0370-8799-2024-12-2
- Данилова А.А., Ткаченко Г.И., Колбин С.А. Фосфатный фонд почвы и отклик ее живой фазы на внесение фосфора // Вестн. Омск. ГАУ. 2022. № 3. С. 70–78. doi: 10.48136/2222-036420223
- Сычев В.Г., Шафран С.А., Виноградова С.Б. Плодородие почв России и пути его регулирования // Агрохимия. 2020. № 6. С. 3–13. doi: 10.31857/S0002188120060125
- Кирюшин В.И. Минеральные удобрения как ключевой фактор развития сельского хозяйства и оптимизации природопользования // Достиж. науки и техн. АПК. 2016. Т. 30. № 3. С. 19–25.
Supplementary files
