Efficacy evaluation of entomological drug Adenoprosin® usage in combined treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostate enlargement
- Authors: Al-Shukri A.S.1, Kostyukov S.V.1, Maksimova A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 11, No 4 (2021)
- Pages: 337-344
- Section: Original articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/uroved/article/view/89410
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved89410
- ID: 89410
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing the effectiveness of treatment of patients with symptoms of the lower urinary tract is one of the main problems of modern urology, which is associated both with their high prevalence and with a significant deterioration in the quality of life of patients.
AIM: The article presents the results of the usage of the entomological drug Adenoprosin® in the combined treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 80 patients were treated (mean age 63.6 ± 6.4 years). At the initial phase of the study, all patients received Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once a day for 4 weeks. At the second phase, the patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 patients were prescribed a combination therapy with Adenoprosin (1 rectal suppository (150 mg) at night, for a course of 30 suppositories) and Tamsulosin (0.4 mg per day). Patients of the 2nd group continued monotherapy with Tamsulosin (0.4 mg per day). The duration of the second phase of treatment was 4 weeks.
RESULTS: The results of the study showed a more pronounced positive dynamics of clinical indicators in patients of the 1st group, who received combination therapy with Adenoprosin and Tamsulosin, compared to patients of the 2nd group. There was a more pronounced decrease in the IPSS score, an improvement in the quality of life, an increase in the urine flow rate and a decrease in the volume of residual urine. The volume of the prostate gland did not change significantly. When examined 2 weeks after the end of treatment, the positive dynamics of clinical indicators in patients of the 1st group persisted. The tolerability of the treatment was satisfactory in patients of both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study indicate the advisability of including Adenoprosin in the combination therapy of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign enlargement of the prostate gland.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Adel S. Al-Shukri
Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
Email: ad330@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6543-8589
SPIN-code: 5024-2184
Scopus Author ID: 28367540300
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Urological Division No. 1 (General and Urgent Urology)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgStanislav V. Kostyukov
Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
Email: stanislav.kostyukov57@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3176-716X
Urologist
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAlbina V. Maksimova
Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: maksimova_av77@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5627-2596
Student
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Launer BM, McVary KT, Ricke WA, Lloyd GL. The rising worldwide impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 2021;127(6):722–728. doi: 10.1111/bju.15286
- Xu XF, Liu GX, Guo YS, et al. Global, Regional, and National Incidence and Year Lived with Disability for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia from 1990 to 2019. Am J Mens Health. 2021;15(4):15579883211036786. doi: 10.1177/15579883211036786
- Kalinina SN, Burlaka OO, Aleksandrov MS, Vydryn PS. Diagnosis and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia. Urologicheskie vedomosti. 2018;8(1):2633. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/uroved8126-33
- Wei J, Calhoun E, Jacobsen S. Urologic diseases in America project: BPH. J Urol. 2005;173(4):1256–1261. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000155709.37840.fe
- Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Seitz M, Kar A, et al. Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol. 2007;177:1419. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.062
- Rasner PI, Pushkar’ DYu. Lechenie simptomov nizhnikh mochevykh putei u patsientov s dobrokachestvennoi giperplaziei predstatel’noi zhelezy: sovremennye mezhdunarodnye standarty. Spravochnik poliklinicheskogo vracha. 2015;(10):20–26. (In Russ.)
- Kasyan GR, Konovalov IV. Current opportunities for combination treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia in men. Issledovaniya i praktika v meditsine 2016;3(2):37–44. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17709/2409-2231-2016-3-2-5
- Zitoun OA, Farhat AM, Mohamed MA, Hamad MR, et al. Management of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) by combinatorial approach using alpha-1-adrenergic antagonists and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors. Eur J Pharmacol. 2020;883:173301 doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173301
- Kuzmin IV, Ajub AK, Slesarevskaya MN. Phos phodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Urology reports (St. Petersburg). 2020;10(1):67–74. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/uroved10167-74
- Al-Shukri AS, Kostyukov SV. Possibilities of phytotherapy in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostate enlargement. Urology reports (St. Petersburg). 2020;10(4):317–323. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/uroved48969
- Gravas S, Cornu JN, Gacci M, et al. Management of Non-neurogenic Male LUTS [internet]. Guideline of European Association of Urology, 2021. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts/#5
- Al-Shukri SH, Gorbachev AG, Borovets SJ, et al. Vlijanie prostatilena na rasstrojstva mocheispuskanija u bol’nyh dobrokachestvennoj giperplaziej predstatel’noj zhelezy. Urologiia. 2005;(5):25–26. (In Russ.)
- Bej-Bienko GYA. Obshchaya entomologiya. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola; 1966. 496 p. (In Russ.)
- Romanenko VN, Meditsinskaya arakhnoentomologiya. Tomsk: Izdatel’skii Dom Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta; 2015. 283 p. (In Russ.)
- Kolesnikova EA, Brusnigina NF, Efimov EI. Evaluation of the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains of genital mycoplasms, isolated in men with inflammatory urogenital diseases. RMJ Medical Review. 2018:2(1):4–7. (In Rus.)
- Kadyrov ZA, Stepanov VS, Faniev MV. Possibilities of entomological drugs in the symptomatic and pathogenetic therapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia and chronic abacterial prostatitis. Andrology and Genital Surgery 2020;21(3):69–74. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17650/2070-9781-2020-21-3-69-74
- Ghicavii V, Tanase A, Ceban E. New direction in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia using Adenoprosin biologically active entomological medicine. Urology. 2011;78(3):96.
- Saidulloev L, Ishonakov KhS, Muminov NO, et al. Effectiveness application of the adenoprosine in patients with chronic prostatitis. Vestnik Akademii meditsinskikh nauk Tadzhikistana. 2018;8(3): 361–366. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31712/2221-7355-2018-8-3-361-368
- Kuz’min IV, Al’-Shukri SKh. Prostagut-forte in benign prostate hyperplasia therapy: is pathogenic approach? Urologicheskie vedomosti. 2012:2(3):18–23. (In Russ.)
- Aboyan IA, Tolmachev AN, Lemeshko SI. Morphological features of hyperplastic prostate tissue in patients with chronic prostatitis. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2020;13(4):82–88. (In Russ.) doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2020-13-4-82-88
- Gandaglia G, Briganti A, Gontero P, et al. The role of chronic prostatic inflammation in the pathogenesis and progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). BJU. 2013;112(4):432–441. doi: 10.1111/bju.12118
- Demidko YuL, Allenov SN, Uzhegov TA, Kasiteridi IG. Effektivnost’ Adenoprosina u patsientov s dobrokachestvennoi giperplaziei predstatel’noi zhelezy, khronicheskim prostatitom i simptomami nizhnikh mochevykh putei. Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya. 2021;17(3): 34–40. (In Russ.) doi: 10.33978/2307-3586-2021-17-3-34-40
- Medvedev VL, Efremov ME. The efficacy of Adenoprosin® in combined treatment of patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2020;(3):45–51. (In Russ.) doi: 10.35401/2500-0268-2020-19-3-45-51
- Kuz’menko AV, Kuz’menko VV, Gyaurgiev TA. Entomologicheskii preparat adenoprosin v lechenii patsientov s dobrokachestvennoi giperplaziei predstatel’noi zhelezy i khronicheskim prostatitom. Urologiia. 2021;(1):39–44. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18565/urology.2021.1.39-44
Supplementary files
