是否足平足症:骨科医生对足弓高度的主观感知
- 作者: Dimitrieva A.J.1, Kenis V.M.2, Sapogovskiy A.V.3
-
隶属关系:
- North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechikov
- The Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics
- The Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- 期: 卷 8, 编号 2 (2020)
- 页面: 179-184
- 栏目: Original Study Article
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/turner/article/view/21192
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PTORS21192
- ID: 21192
如何引用文章
详细
论证:平足的视觉诊断方法是最常见的在儿科矫形医师的实践。为了证明其作为标准的合理性,有必要确认专家的充分一致性。
目的是确定在儿童平足症的视觉诊断中足弓高度感知的一致性。
材料与方法。在第一阶段,对187名小学生(374个脚)进行了检查。所有患儿均接受了检查,并进行了电脑平面摄影检查。在研究的第二阶段,随机选取130张右脚的图像,这些图像来自标准的中、
外侧和后部,通过电子方式提供给32名骨科医生(其中10名是专门从事足病理的专家)。专家们必须注意提交分析的脚是否为平的。为了确定专家间的一致性,使用了w-Kendall一和谐系数和τ-Kendall相关系数,5个月后,计算了k-Cohen系数。
结果。根据我们的研究结果,专家间和专家内的可靠性指标因骨科医生是否擅长足部病理而存在显著差异。在计算和谐系数时,5个月后专家之间的一致性程度增加(分别为0.58和0.76),不像矫形外科医生,其不是专门从事脚的病理。尽管同一脚专家的意见存在一定的异质性,但总体相关系数均达到了良好和优秀的一致性水平(0.65-0.84)。专家中评估平足症诊断视觉标准稳定性参数的k-Cohen系数具有较好的信度(0.72),而在非足病专业的骨科医生中,该系数较低(0.31)。在评估同一足部的影像时,根据专家的说法,平足症的发生率为24.6%,而根据不擅长足部病理的整形外科医生的说法,平足症的发生率为40.9%。
结论。专家对哪只脚考虑平表现出良好和优秀的一致性水平,可用于确定内侧纵弓人体测量指标的参考值。
作者简介
Alyona Dimitrieva
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechikov
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: aloyna17@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3610-7788
SPIN 代码: 7112-8638
Scopus 作者 ID: 1026726
PhD Student of Chair of Traumatology and Orthopedics for Children
俄罗斯联邦, 195015, St. Petersburg, Kirochnaya St., 41Vladimir Kenis
The Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics
Email: kenis@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7651-8485
SPIN 代码: 5597-8832
Scopus 作者 ID: 36191914200
http://www.rosturner.ru/kl4.htm
MD, PhD, D.Sc., Professor, Deputy Director of Development and International Relations, Head of the Department of Foot Pathology, Neuroorthopedics and Systemic Diseases
俄罗斯联邦, 64, Parkovaya str., Saint-Petersburg, Pushkin, 196603Andrei Sapogovskiy
The Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics, Saint Petersburg, Russia
Email: sapogovskiy@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5762-4477
SPIN 代码: 2068-2102
Scopus 作者 ID: 808611
MD, PhD, Senior Research Associate of the Department of Foot Pathology, Neuroorthopedics and Systemic Diseases
俄罗斯联邦, 196603, St. Petersburg, Pushkin, Parkovaya st. 64-68参考
- Большая медицинская энциклопедия. Т. 19 / под ред. Б.В. Петровского. – 3-е изд. – М.: Советская энциклопедия, 1989. [Bol’shaya meditsinskaya entsiklopediya. Izdanie tret’e. Vol. 19. Ed. by B.V. Petrovskiy. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya; 1989. (In Russ.)]
- Chuckpaiwong B, Nunley JA, 2nd, Queen RM. Correlation between static foot type measurements and clinical assessments. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(3):205-212. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2009.0205.
- Hosl M, Bohm H, Multerer C, Doderlein L. Does excessive flatfoot deformity affect function? A comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic flatfeet using the Oxford Foot Model. Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.05.017.
- Houck JR, Tome JM, Nawoczenski DA. Subtalar neutral position as an offset for a kinematic model of the foot during walking. Gait Posture. 2008;28(1):29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.09.008.
- Армасов А.Р., Киселев В.Я. Диагностическая ценность метода визуальной оценки стоп при диагностике плоскостопия у подростков // Гений ортопедии. – 2010. – № 3. – С. 101–104. [Armasov AR, Kiselev VY. Diagnostic value of the technique for feet visual estimation in adolescent platypodia determination. Genij ortopedii. 2010;(3):101-104. (In Russ.)]
- Dahle LK, Mueller MJ, Delitto A, Diamond JE. Visual assessment of foot type and relationship of foot type to lower extremity injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1991;14(2): 70-74. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1991.14.2.70.
- Cowan DN, Robinson JR, Jones BH, et al. Consistency of visual assessments of arch height among clinicians. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(4):213-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079401500411.
- Redmond AC, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA. Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: the Foot Posture Index. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21(1):89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.002.
- Keenan AM, Redmond AC, Horton M, et al. The Foot Posture Index: Rasch analysis of a novel, foot-specific outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(1):88-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.005.
- Cain LE, Nicholson LL, Adams RD, Burns J. Foot morphology and foot/ankle injury in indoor football. J Sci Med Sport. 2007;10(5):311-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2006.07.012.
- Evans AM, Rome K, Peet L. The foot posture index, ankle lunge test, Beighton scale and the lower limb assessment score in healthy children: a reliability study. J Foot Ankle Res. 2012;5(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-5-1.
- Evans AM, Copper AW, Scharfbillig RW, et al. Reliability of the foot posture index and traditional measures of foot position. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003;93(3):203-213. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-93-3-203.
- Mentiplay BF, Clark RA, Mullins A, et al. Reliability and validity of the Microsoft Kinect for evaluating static foot posture. J Foot Ankle Res. 2013;6(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-6-14.
- Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.
补充文件
