Collagen drainage device in penetrating surgery of primary open-angle glaucoma
- 作者: Gavrilova T.V.1,2, Mukhamadeeva S.N.2, Antsyferova V.A.1, Chereshneva M.V.3
-
隶属关系:
- Academician Ye.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University
- Perm Regional Clinical Hospital
- Institute of Immunology and Physiology, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
- 期: 卷 18, 编号 3 (2025)
- 页面: 25-31
- 栏目: Original study articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/ov/article/view/349523
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/OV679923
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NSNBSY
- ID: 349523
如何引用文章
详细
BACKGROUND: Glaucoma affects 64 million people worldwide. It is the leading cause of visual disability in the Russian Federation, therefore treatment continues to present a challenge. For patients with glaucoma uncontrolled by drug or laser hypotensive therapy, drainage device implantation is the most definitive and effective surgery.
AIM: The study aimed to evaluate the hypotensive effectiveness and safety of collagen drainage device implantation during trabeculectomy to treat primary open-angle glaucoma.
METHODS: We analyzed medical records of 162 patients (162 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma who underwent hypotensive penetrating surgery, trabeculectomy with (group 1) and without (group 2) Xenoplast collagen drainage device implantation. The results were evaluated for up to 36 months.
RESULTS: The positive surgical effect, including absolute and relative success, was achieved in 98% of patients in group 1 at discharge, then gradually decreased and reached 73% of cases after 36 months. In group 2, the positive effect was achieved in 91% and subsequently decreased to 48% within the same follow-up period. In the early postoperative period, patients in both groups (33.8% and 40.2%) experienced complications, typical for penetrating hypotensive surgery and comparable with published data.
CONCLUSION: An analysis of the surgical outcomes indicates superiority of trabeculectomy with Xenoplast drainage device implantation.
作者简介
Tatyana Gavrilova
Academician Ye.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University; Perm Regional Clinical Hospital
Email: gavrilova.tv@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2071-9322
SPIN 代码: 5947-8762
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
俄罗斯联邦, Perm; PermSvetlana Mukhamadeeva
Perm Regional Clinical Hospital
Email: Svetlanamuckh@gmail.com
MD
俄罗斯联邦, PermValentina Antsyferova
Academician Ye.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: AnciferovaValya@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9806-0559
SPIN 代码: 7513-7140
俄罗斯联邦, Perm
Margarita Chereshneva
Institute of Immunology and Physiology, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: mchereshneva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6169-7978
SPIN 代码: 9571-3646
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
俄罗斯联邦, Yekaterinburg参考
- World Health Organization. World report on vision, 2020. Geneva: WHO; 2020. 180 p.
- Movsisyan AB, Kuroedov AV, Arkharov MA, et al. Epidemiological analysis primary open-angle glaucoma incidence and prevalence in Russia. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2022;22(1):3–10. doi: 10.32364/2311-7729-2022-22-1-3-10 EDN: VIMPIU
- Anisimov SI, Anisimova SYu, Arutyunyan LL, Voznyuk AP. Drainage devices in refractory glaucoma surgery. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2019;12(3):85–93. doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2019-12-3-85-93 EDN: ECJLWW
- Tereshchenko AV, Trifanenkova IG, Molotkova IA, Zhukov SS. Drainage devices in glaucoma surgery. National Journal Glaucoma. 2020;19(2):88–96. doi: 10.25700/NJG.2020.02.10 EDN: FGHSZA
- Gavrilova TV, Lyubimov KS, Mukhamadeeva SN, Chereshneva MV. Using of modern types of drainage in glaucoma surgery: our experience. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2020;13(1):71–76. doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-1-71-76 EDN: SRDQMB
- All-Russian Public Organization Association of Ophthalmologists; All-Russian Public Organization Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia; All-Russian Public Organization Russian Society of Ophthalmologists-Glaucomatologists. Clinical guidelines: Primary open-angle glaucoma. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; 2024. (In Russ.)
- Cairns JE. Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968;66(4):673–679. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(68)91288-9
- Anisimova SYu, Anisimov SI, Rogacheva IV. Remote results of surgical treatment of refractory glaucoma using collagen drainage resistant to biodegradation. Glaucoma. 2011;(2):28–33. (In Russ.)
- Suleiman EA, Petrov SYu. A new technique in glaucoma surgery with biodegradable drainage implant to stabilize hypertensive effect. Point of view. East – West. 2023;2:32 doi: 10.25276/2410-1257-2023-2-32-36. EDN: ENUASN
- Petrov SYu, Podgornaya NN, Aslamazova AE. Choroidal effusion. National Journal Glaucoma. 2015;14(1):94–102. EDN: TPNJIP
- Egorov EA, editor. Glaucoma. National guide. Moscow: 2013; 824 p. (In Russ.)
- Krasyuk EYu, Noskova OG, Akulov SI, et al. The experience of using biodegradable drainage in combination with traditional sinustrabeculectomy. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2018;14(4):633–638. EDN: NBIZJU.
- Antonova AV, Nikolaenko VP, Brzhesky VV, Vuks AYa. The efficacy of sinustrabeculectomy in the modern clinical practice. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2023;23(1):21–26. doi: 10.32364/2311-7729-2023-23-1-21-26. EDN: PZVBHK.
- Kurbanov SA, Gabdrakhmanova AF, Gaynutdinova RF. New method of surgical treatment of glaucoma. Kazan Medical Journal. 2022. doi: 10.17816/KMJ87536. EDN: AGFEIQ.
- Anisimova S.Yu. New approaches to outpatient surgical treatment of open-angle glaucoma and its combination with cataracts [dissertation]. Moscow; 2006. 235 c. (In Russ.) EDN: QEBRJR.
- Katargina LA, Mazanova EV, Pleskova AV, Denisova EV. Results of applying of drainage xenoplast in glaucoma surgery in children. 2015;10(1)18–21. EDN: TSKQXN
- Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Tsygankov AYu, et al. Results of glaucoma surgical treatment (non-penetrating deep sclerectomy and implantation of collagen and bioresorbable drainages). Effective pharmacotherapy 2022;18(11):30–35. doi: 10.33978/2307-3586-2022-18-11-30-35 EDN: PUSIAR
补充文件





