Biobanking in obstetrics research: the opinions of project participants on the safety of donating biospecimens during pregnancy
- 作者: Pachuliia O.V.1, Postnikova T.B.1, Illarionov R.A.1, Vashukova E.S.1, Maltseva A.R.1, Tigina O.D.1, Kornyushina E.A.1, Bespalova O.N.1, Glotov A.S.1
-
隶属关系:
- The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
- 期: 卷 74, 编号 5 (2025)
- 页面: 48-61
- 栏目: Original study articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/jowd/article/view/363331
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD689259
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QXQKIN
- ID: 363331
如何引用文章
详细
BACKGROUND: The emergence of a new direction in biomedicine often leads to conflicting attitudes regarding its safety and potential short- and long-term consequences for patients and their families. The development of biobanking, which involves collecting biological samples for long-term storage and repeated use in the various types of research, is no exception. Initial survey results indicate insufficient awareness about the existence of biobanks, their functions, and safety among not only patients but also specialists. This lack of information leads to unfounded concerns about the safety of biobanking, which, in turn, complicates donor recruitment for research projects. This is particularly significant when attracting donors from vulnerable groups such as pregnant women. Studying the opinions of project participants will help assess not only the perceived safety of participation in a specific pregnancy-related project but also their willingness to be engaged in similar initiatives as an integral indicator of their experience.
AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the opinions of participants in a biobanking research project regarding the safety of donating biological samples during pregnancy and to evaluate their satisfaction with project participation.
METHODS: A pilot cross-sectional study was conducted. Using an 18-question online questionnaire, we conducted an anonymous survey among participants during pregnancy regarding their experiences in the biobanking research project.
RESULTS: We surveyed 51 women. The survey analysis revealed that 92% (47) of respondents had no concerns about the safety of providing researchers with personal data, 100% (51) of women had no concerns about sharing clinical data, and 96% (46) of women felt secure about donating biological material. According to the survey, 100% (51) of respondents reported no medical complications related to the biological sample collection procedure. Participants expressed high overall satisfaction with their participation in the biobanking research project: the average score was 9.0 (on a scale of 0.0 to 10.0). Additionally, 92% (47) of respondents expressed willingness to participate in other biobanking research projects.
CONCLUSION: The results of this pilot study are important for shaping the attitudes of both specialists involved in recruiting pregnant women for biobanking research projects and potential participants who may consider joining such projects based on the experiences of others.
作者简介
Olga Pachuliia
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: for.olga.kosyakova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4116-0222
SPIN 代码: 1204-3160
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgTatyana Postnikova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: ptb20@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8227-2629
SPIN 代码: 5354-4640
MD
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgRoman Illarionov
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: a.illarionov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2711-748X
SPIN 代码: 6901-3640
MD
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgElena Vashukova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: vi_lena@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6996-8891
SPIN 代码: 2811-8730
Cand. Sci. (Biology)
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgAnastasiya Maltseva
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: nastya.chentsova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5647-6783
SPIN 代码: 9514-5746
MD
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgOksana Tigina
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: tiginaoxana@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-5627-7161
MD
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgEkaterina Kornyushina
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: hapacheva@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-5918-2697
SPIN 代码: 5844-1975
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgOlesya Bespalova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: shiggerra@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6542-5953
SPIN 代码: 4732-8089
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgAndrey Glotov
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: anglotov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7465-4504
SPIN 代码: 1406-0090
Scopus 作者 ID: 7004340255
Researcher ID: E-8525-2015
Dr. Sci. (Biology)
俄罗斯联邦, Saint Petersburg参考
- Mikhailova AA, Nasykhova YuA, Muravyov AI, et al. Towards the creation of a unified glossary of biobanks in the Russian Federation. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2020;19(6):2710. doi: 10.15829/1728-8800-2020-2710 EDN: JLZTWL
- Maleina MN. Legal status of a biobank (human biological materials bank). Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2020;(1):98–117. doi: 10.17323/2072-8166.2020.1.98.117
- Mikhailova AA, Bogomiagkova ES, Nasykhova YuA, et al. Healthcare professionals and scientists’ collaboration with biobanks: a pilot study on the assessment of knowledge and attitudes toward biospecimen donation. Frontiers in Medicine. 2025;12:1497209. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1497209 EDN: CECYAH
- Bakhareva YuO, Kamenskikh EM, Krygina AYu, et al. Issues of trust and motivation in biobanking. Journal of Social Policy Studies. 2024;22(4):745–756. doi: 10.17323/727-0634-2024-22-4-745-756 EDN: REKPBP
- van der Zande ISE, van der Graaf R, Oudijk MA, et al. Vulnerability of pregnant women in clinical research. J Med Ethics. 2017;43(10):657–663. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103955 EDN: YHFLEO
- González-Duarte A, Zambrano-González E, Medina-Franco H, et al. II. The research ethics involving vulnerable groups. Rev Invest Clin. 2019;71(4):217–225. doi: 10.24875/RIC.19002812 EDN: KQNTBN
- Declarations, conventions, agreements and other legal materials. In: Organization of United Nations [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 13] Available from: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/bioethics_and_hr.shtml
- WMA Declaration of Helsinki ethical principles for medical research involving human participants. In: World Medical Association [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jul 10] Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/
- Subpart B – additional protections for pregnant women. In: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jul 12] Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/common-rule-subpart-b/index.html
- Majchrowska A, Pawlikowski J, Sak J, et al. Genetic tests as the strongest motivator of cooperation between participants and biobanks-findings from cross-sectional study. Front Genet. 2024;15:1321690. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1321690 EDN: LCXELX
- Domaradzki J, Pawlikowski J. Public attitudes toward biobanking of human biological material for research purposes: a literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(12):2209. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122209
- Antonova N, Eritsyan K. It is not a big deal: a qualitative study of clinical biobank donation experience and motives. BMC Med Ethics. 2022;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00743-6 EDN: HHNWIH
- Sanderson SC, Brothers KB, Mercaldo ND, et al. Public attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobank research: a large multi-site experimental survey in the US. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100(3):414–427. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.021
- Bani M, Ardenghi S, Russo S, et al. Fear of donation-related stimuli across different levels of donation experience and types of donation (whole-blood and plasma): a cross-sectional study in Italian donors. Transfusion. 2024;64(12):2306–2313. doi: 10.1111/trf.18062 EDN: KGJXVH
- Nobile H, Vermeulen E, Thys K, et al. Why do participants enroll in population biobank studies? A systematic literature review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2013;13(1):35–47. doi: 10.1586/erm.12.116
- Overby CL, Maloney KA, Alestock TD, et al. Prioritizing approaches to engage community members and build trust in biobanks: a survey of attitudes and opinions of adults within outpatient practices at the University of Maryland. J Pers Med. 2015;5(3):264–279. doi: 10.3390/jpm5030264
补充文件
