Comparative evaluation of different minimally invasive methods of genital prolapse correction
- Authors: Popov A.A.1, Gorsky S.L.1, Manannikova T.N.1, Shahinyan G.G.1, Petrova V.D.1, Chechneva M.A.1
 - 
							Affiliations: 
							
- Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
 
 - Issue: Vol 49, No 5S (2000)
 - Pages: 20-21
 - Section: Articles
 - URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/jowd/article/view/100259
 - DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD100259
 - ID: 100259
 
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
By minimally invasive methods of surgical treatment we mean benefits performed under endoscopic, transvaginal or percutaneous access without extensive opening of the skin, aponeurosis, and abdominal cavity. The development of minimally invasive surgery is currently the most promising trend in all fields of medicine, gynecology in particular. The advantages of minimally invasive technologies manifest themselves most fully at surgeries in hard-to-reach for traditional surgery areas, such as the cervical space of the small pelvis and the urethrovesical segment area. This fact together with high frequency of genital prolapse and dissatisfaction with the results of earlier proposed methods of treatment determined our interest in this problem.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
A. A. Popov
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
							Author for correspondence.
							Email: info@eco-vector.com
				                					                																			                												                	Russian Federation, 							Moscow						
S. L. Gorsky
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
														Email: info@eco-vector.com
				                					                																			                												                	Russian Federation, 							Moscow						
T. N. Manannikova
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
														Email: info@eco-vector.com
				                					                																			                												                	Russian Federation, 							Moscow						
G. G. Shahinyan
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
														Email: info@eco-vector.com
				                					                																			                												                	Russian Federation, 							Moscow						
V. D. Petrova
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
														Email: info@eco-vector.com
				                					                																			                												                	Russian Federation, 							Moscow						
M. A. Chechneva
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
														Email: info@eco-vector.com
				                					                																			                												                	Russian Federation, 							Moscow						
References
Supplementary files
				
			
					
						
						
				
