Мақаланы E-mail арқылы жіберу MONITORING OF SPACE WEATHER EFFECTS WITH SOZVEZDIE-270 NANOSATELLITE CONSTELLATION OF MOSCOW UNIVERSITY
- Авторлар: Bogomolov A.V.1, Bogomolov V.V.2,1, Iyudin A.F.2, Kalegaev V.V.2,1, Myagkova I.N.3, Osedlo V.I.2, Svertilov S.I.2,1, Yashin I.V.2
-
Мекемелер:
- M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
- M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, D.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics
- D.V. Skobeltsyn Scientific Research Institute of Nuclear Physics
- Шығарылым: Том 11, № 3 (2025)
- Беттер: 137-148
- Бөлім: 15th Russian-Chinese Workshop on Space Weather, September 9–13, 2024, Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics SB RAS
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2712-9640/article/view/362433
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/szf-113202515
- ID: 362433
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
The space project Sozvezdie-270 of Moscow University is in progress now. It involves the deployment of a CubeSat nanosatellites constellation. To the present, 20 satellites have been launched, 9 of them continue to function in near-Earth orbit; one more will be launched in the near future. Instruments were developed specifically for the experiments on board small spacecraft of the CubeSat format, which provide measurements of fluxes and spectrum of charged particles, primarily electrons of relativistic and sub-relativistic energies, as well as gamma quanta. Along with the space constellation, a network of ground receiving stations is also being created. A multi-satellite constellation gives a number of advantages in studying dynamic processes in near-Earth space. In particular, it makes it possible to carry out simultaneous measurements of charged particle fluxes with instruments of the same type at different points in near-Earth space. Such measurements provide unique information about the flux of sub-relativistic electrons, including variations due to precipitation of electrons, which is of great importance for understanding the mechanisms of acceleration and losses of trapped and quasi-trapped electrons in Earth’s radiation belts (ERB).
We discuss various recent space weather manifestations associated with increased solar flare activity. Among such effects is the filling of the polar caps with particles of solar cosmic rays, dynamic processes in outer ERB during magnetic storms, rapid variations in electron fluxes due to precipitation.We discuss various recent space weather manifestations associated with increased solar flare activity. Among such effects is the filling of the polar caps with particles of solar cosmic rays, dynamic processes in outer ERB during magnetic storms, rapid variations in electron fluxes due to precipitation.
We discuss various recent space weather manifestations associated with increased solar flare activity. Among such effects is the filling of the polar caps with particles of solar cosmic rays, dynamic processes in outer ERB during magnetic storms, rapid variations in electron fluxes due to precipitation.
We discuss various recent space weather manifestations associated with increased solar flare activity. Among such effects is the filling of the polar caps with particles of solar cosmic rays, dynamic processes in outer ERB during magnetic storms, rapid variations in electron fluxes due to precipitation.We discuss various recent space weather manifestations associated with increased solar flare activity. Among such effects is the filling of the polar caps with particles of solar cosmic rays, dynamic processes in outer ERB during magnetic storms, rapid variations in electron fluxes due to precipitation.
We discuss various recent space weather manifestations associated with increased solar flare activity. Among such effects is the filling of the polar caps with particles of solar cosmic rays, dynamic processes in outer ERB during magnetic storms, rapid variations in electron fluxes due to precipitation.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
Andrey Bogomolov
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: aabboogg@srd.sinp.msu.ru
SINP
Vitaliy Bogomolov
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, D.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics; M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: bogovit@rambler.ru
candidate of physical and mathematical sciences
Anatoliy Iyudin
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, D.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics
Email: aiyudin@srd.sinp.msu.ru
doctor of physical and mathematical sciences
Vladimir Kalegaev
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, D.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics; M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: klg@dec1.sinp.msu.ru
doctor of physical and mathematical sciences
Irina Myagkova
D.V. Skobeltsyn Scientific Research Institute of Nuclear PhysicsLaboratory of Space Physics Research, Senior Researcher, candidate of physical and mathematical sciences
Vladislav Osedlo
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, D.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics
Email: osedlo@mail.ru
candidate of physical and mathematical sciences
Sergey Svertilov
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, D.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics; M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: sis@coronas.ru
doctor of physical and mathematical sciences
Ivan Yashin
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, D.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics
Email: ivn@eas.sinp.msu.ru
candidate of physical and mathematical sciences
Әдебиет тізімі
Белов А.В., Виллорези Дж., Дорман Л.И. и др. Влияние космической среды на функционирование искусственных спутников Земли. Геомагнетизм и аэрономия. 2004, т. 44, № 4, с. 502–510. Богомолов А.В., Денисов Ю.И., Колесов Г.Я. и др. Потоки квазизахваченных электронов с энергиями >0.08 МэВ в околоземном пространстве на дрейфовых оболочках L<2. Космические исследования. 2005, т. 43, № 5, с. 323–329. Богомолов В.В., Богомолов А.В., Дементьев Ю.Н. и др. Первый опыт мониторинга космической радиации в мультиспутниковом эксперименте Московского университета в рамках проекта «Универсат-СОКРАТ». Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 3: Физика, астрономия. 2020, т. 73, № 6, с. 135–141. Вернов С.Н., Григоров Н.Л., Логачев Ю.И., Чудаков А.Е. Измерения космического излучения на искусственном спутнике Земли. Доклады Академии наук. 1958, т. 120, № 6, с. 1231–1233. Дорман Л.И., Мирошниченко Л.И. Солнечные космические лучи. М.: Наука, 1968, 468 с. Кузнецов С.Н., Мягкова И.Н. Потоки квазизахваченных частиц над радиационными поясами Земли. Геомагнетизм и аэрономия, 2001, т. 41, № 1, c. 12–15. Кузнецов С.Н., Богомолов А.В., Денисов Ю.И. и др. Солнечная вспышка 4 ноября 2001 г. и ее проявления в энергичных частицах по данным ИСЗ «Коронас-Ф». Астрономический вестник. Исследования солнечной системы. 2003, т. 37, № 2, с. 137–143. doi: 10.1023/A:1023384425209. Кузнецов Н.В., Ныммик Р.А., Панасюк М.И. Попова Е. Действующие модели потоков заряженных частиц космического пространства и новые экспериментальные данные. Вопросы атомной науки и техники. Сер.: физика радиационного воздействия на радиоэлектронную аппаратуру. 2014, № 1, с. 44–48. Мягкова И.Н., Богомолов А.В., Еремеев В.Е. и др. Динамика радиационной обстановки в околоземном пространстве в сентябре–ноябре 2020 г. по данным спутников «Метеор-М» и «Электро-Л». Космические исследования. 2021, т. 59, № 6, с. 460–472. doi: 10.31857/S0023420621060078. Новиков Л.С., Воронина Е.Н. Взаимодействие космических аппаратов с окружающей средой. М.: КДУ, 2021. Панасюк М.И., Свертилов С.И., Богомолов В.В. и др. Эксперимент на спутнике «Вернов»: транзиентные энергичные процессы в атмосфере и магнитосфере Земли. Ч. 1. Описание эксперимента. Космические исследования. 2016a, т. 54, № 4, с. 277–285. doi: 10.7868/S002342061604004X. Панасюк М.И., Свертилов С.И., Богомолов В.В. и др. Эксперимент на спутнике «Вернов»: транзиентные энергичные процессы в атмосфере и магнитосфере Земли. Ч. 2. Первые результаты. Космические исследования. 2016б, т. 54, № 5, с. 369–376. doi: 10.7868/S0023420616050071. Романова Н.В., Пилипенко В.А., Ягова Н.В. и др. Статистическая связь частоты сбоев на геостационарных спутниках с потоками энергичных электронов и протонов. Космические исследования. 2005, т. 43, № 3, с. 186–193. Садовничий В.А., Панасюк М.И., Яшин И.В. и др. Исследования космической среды на микроспутниках «Университетский—Татьяна» и «Университетский—Татьяна-2». Астрономический вестник. Исследования солнечной системы. 2011, т. 45, № 1, с. 5–31. Baker D.N. Satellite Anomalies due to space storms. Space Storms and Space Weather Hazards. 2001, vol. 38. Springer, Dordrecht. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0983-6_11. Bashkirov V.F., Denisov Y.I., Gotselyuk Y.V., et al. Trapped and quasi-trapped radiation observed by “CORONAS-I” satellite. Radiation Measurements. 1999, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 537–546. Caspi A., Barthelemy M., Bussy-Virat C.D., et al. Small satellite mission concepts for space weather research and as pathfinders for operations. Space Weather, 2022, vol. 20, iss. 2, e2020SW002554. doi: 10.1029/2020SW002554. Cole D.G. Space weather: Its effects and predictability. Space Sci. Rev. 2003, vol. 107, pp. 295‒302. doi: 10.1023/A:1025500513499. Daglis I.A. Space Storms and Space Weather Hazards. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, 2001. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0983-6. Ginet G.P., O’Brien T.P., Huston S.L. AE9, AP9 and SPM: New models for specifying the trapped energetic particle and space plasma environment. Space Sci. Rev. 2013, vol. 179, pp. 579–615 doi: 10.1007/s11214-013-9964y. Iucci N., Levitin A., Belov E., Eroshenko E.A. Space weather conditions and spacecraft anomalies in different orbits. Space Weather. 2005, vol. 3, S01001. DOI: 10.1029/ 2003SW000056. Kudela K. Space weather near Earth and energetic particles: selected results. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series. 2013, vol. 409, iss. 1, article id. 012017. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/409/1/012017. Kuznetsov S.N., Myagkova I.N. Quasi-trapped electron fluxes (>0.5 MeV) under the radiation belts: analysis of their connection with geomagnetic indices. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 2002, vol. 64, no. 5-6. pp. 601–605. Lundstedt H. The Sun, space weather and GIC effects in Sweden. Adv. Space Res. 2006, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1182–1191. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2005.10.023. McGranaghan R.M., Camporeale E., Georgoulis M., Anastasiadis A. Space weather research in the digital age and across the full data lifecycle: Introduction to the topical issue. J. Space Weather and Space Climate. 2021, vol. 11, p. 50. doi: 10.1051/swsc/2021037. Nagata K., Kohno T., Murakami H., et al. Electron (0.19–3.2 MeV) and proton (0.58–35 MeV) precipitations observed by OHZORA satellite at low latitude zones L=1.6–1.8. Planet. Space Sci. 1988, vol. 36, pp. 591–606. Potapov A., Ryzhakova L., Tsegmed B. A new approach to predict and estimate enhancements of “killer” electron flux at geosynchronous orbit. Acta Astronaut. 2016, vol. 126, pp. 47–51. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.04.017. Sadovnichii V.A., Panasyuk M.I., Amelyushkin A.M., et al. “Lomonosov” satellite — space observatory to study extreme phenomena in space. Space Sci. Rev. 2017, vol. 212, no. 3-4, pp. 1705–1738. Schrijver C.J., Kauristie K., Aylward A.D., et al. Understanding space weather to shield society: A global road map 772 for 2015–2025 commissioned by COSPAR and ILWS. Adv. Space Res. 2015, vol. 55, pp. 2745‒2807. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2015.03.023. Wei F., Feng X., Guo J.S., et al. Space weather research in China. Adv. in Space Environment Res. Springer, Dordrecht. 2003, pp. 327–334. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1069-6_31. Wilkinson P. Space weather studies in Australia. Space Weather: The Intern. J. Research and Applications. 2009, vol. 7, S06002. doi: 10.1029/2009SW000485. URL: https://swx.sinp.msu.ru/tools/davisat.php (дата обращения 22 июля 2025 г.).
Қосымша файлдар
