Dynamics of the ultrasonographic picture of the skin and subcutaneous tissue in the physiotherapy treatment of cellulite by compression microvibration: а non-randomized prospective study
- Authors: Kardashova Z.Z.1, Selezneva E.V.1, Ratnikova N.O.1, Vasilenko I.A.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
- The Kosygin State University of Russia
- Issue: Vol 5, No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 227-236
- Section: ORIGINAL STUDY ARTICLE
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2658-6843/article/view/253820
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.36425/rehab568644
- ID: 253820
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Various methods are offered to effectively eliminate cellulite and improve skin appearance; however, its treatment remains one of the most difficult tasks in aesthetic medicine. The arsenal of tools that allow an objective assessment of cosmetic and esthetic therapeutic measures is very limited.
AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of the compression microvibration method to treat structural and functional skin changes in women with gynoid lipodystrophy of different age groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, nonrandomized, prospective study of the effectiveness of the compression microvibration method (“Endospheres Therapy®”) was carried out in 27 women (40–69 years old) with mild-to-moderate gynoid lipodystrophy under the control of ultrasonographic skin examination before treatment, after 12 procedures, and after 2 months. After a course of therapy, skin ultrasonography was performed using a specialized high-resolution digital ultrasound system DUB SkinScanner (tpm GmbH, Germany) equipped with a 75 MHz transducer with a resolution of 21 µm and a scanning depth of 4–6 mm. Additionally, anthropometric parameters were measured, and the body mass index was calculated.
RESULTS: Changes in body mass index (BMI) revealed a trend toward weight loss in most of the participants. The circumference of the hips and waist in participants aged 40–49, 50–59 and 60–69 years decreased by 3.0±1.1 and 5.3±1.1, 2.2±0.9 and 4.1±1.3 and 2.5±0.9 and 6.3±1.5 cm, respectively. It was found that after the course of Endospheres Therapy in patients of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd age groups in the areas of the anterior, inner, posterior surface of the thigh and the anterior surface of the abdomen, the thickness of the dermis decreased by 15.6, 9.5 and 18.1%; 10.9, 10.5 and 19.3%; 6.1, 15.7 and 13.8%, 23.4, 14.7 and 14.5% (p <0.05), respectively; increased echogenicity of the dermis in the areas of the anterior, inner, posterior thigh and anterior abdominal surface by 2, 1.4 and 1.3; 1.2, 1.4 and 1.2; 1.4, 1.4 and 1.5; 1.3, 1.5 and 1.7 times (p <0.05), respectively. The echogenicity of the hypodermis decreased in the studied areas by 30.8, 27.6 and 31.2% (p <0.05); 20.1, 37.3 and 40.4% (p <0.05); 43.2, 57.8 (p <0.05) and 9.3%; 23.6, 15.2 (p <0.05) and 9.3%, respectively. The effect persisted 60 days after the course of therapy.
CONCLUSION: These results have convincingly demonstrated the effectiveness of Endospheres Therapy in women with mild-to-moderate gynoid lipodystrophy for body shaping and skin improvement in the long term without revealing any side effects.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Ziver Z. Kardashova
Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
Author for correspondence.
Email: kard-dina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0095-1706
SPIN-code: 7806-8613
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowElena V. Selezneva
Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
Email: selezneva-elena@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6181-9031
SPIN-code: 9748-6169
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowNatalia O. Ratnikova
Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
Email: ratnikova.natalya@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-6568-5286
Russian Federation, Moscow
Irina A. Vasilenko
Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute; The Kosygin State University of Russia
Email: vasilenko.ia0604@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6374-9786
SPIN-code: 6611-9990
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowReferences
- Bennardo L, Fusco I, Cuciti C, et al. Microwave therapy for cellulite: An effective non-invasive treatment. J Clin Med. 2022;11(3):515. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030515
- Paveliev YV. Causes of cellulite and the main methods of influencing it. Bulletin Sci Education. 2020;88(10):100–105. (In Russ).
- Plieva LR. Cellulitis vs cellulite. Russ J Skin Venereal Diseases. 2015;18(6):42–49. (In Russ).
- Young V, Di Bernardo BE. Comparison of cellulite severity scales and imaging methods. Aesthetic Sur J. 2021;41(6):NP521–NP537. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa226
- Tokarska K, Tokarski S, Woźniacka A, et al. Cellulite: A cosmetic or systemic issue? Contemporary views on the etiopathogenesis of cellulite. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2018;35(5):442–446. doi: 10.5114/ada.2018.77235
- Bass LS, Kaminer MS. Insights into the pathophysiology of cellulite: A review. Dermatol Surg. 2020;46(Suppl 1):S77–S85. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002388
- Stevens WG, Green J, Layt C, et al. Multicenter pivotal study demonstrates safety and efficacy of a new cellulite procedure: 3-Month results. Aesthet Surg J. 2023;43(1):97–108. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac179
- Layt C. A study of a novel controlled focal septa release method for improving cellulite. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022;10(4):e4237. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004237
- Arora G, Patil A, Hooshanginezhad Z, et al. Cellulite: Presentation and management. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(4):1393–1401. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14815
- Hogan S, Velez MW, Kaminer MS. Updates on the understanding and treatment of cellulite. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2018;37(4): 242–246. doi: 10.12788/j.sder.2018.056
- Piotrowska A, Czerwińska-Ledwig O, Stefańska M, et al. Changes in skin microcirculation resulting from vibration therapy in women with cellulite. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6):3385. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063385
- Christman MP, Belkin D, Geronemus RG, Brauer JA. An anatomical approach to evaluating and treating cellulite. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(1):58–61.
- Cristovam DN, Botelho S, Andrade MF, et al. Whole-body vibration in the reduction of the cellulite. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2019;21(5):278–285. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2018.1525750
- Sadowski T, Bielfeldt S, Wilhelm K, et al. Objective and subjective reduction of cellulite volume using a localized vibrational massage device in a 24-week randomized intra-individual single-blind regression study. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2020;42(3):277–288. doi: 10.1111/ics.12613
- Pilch W, Czerwińska-Ledwig O, Chitryniewicz-Rostek J, et al. The impact of vibration therapy interventions on skin condition and skin temperature changes in young women with lipodystrophy: A pilot study. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2019;2019:8436325. doi: 10.1155/2019/8436325
- Metelin VB, Fomicheva AA, Kardashova ZZ et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of non-invasive methods of compressive microvibration and ablative sensory microvibration on local areas with excess fat deposits in volunteers of different age groups. J Applied Cosmetol. 2023;41(2):74. doi: 10.56609/jac.v41i2.278
- Kardashova ZZ, Ratnikova NО, Vasilenko IA, Fomicheva AA. Compression microvibration: Experience of using the method for the physiotherapeutic treatment of cellulite. Physiotherapy Balneol Rehabilitat. 2022;21(6):391–400. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/rjpbr403993
- Bezugly AP, Bikbulatova NN, Kruglova LS, et al. Features of the ultrasonographic picture of the skin and subcutaneous tissue in cellulite. Physiotherapist. 2015;(1):3–7. (In Russ).
- Bondarenko IN. Comparative analysis of ultrasound examination of the skin with high-frequency sensors. Radiology ― Practice. 2021;(6):22–30. (In Russ). doi: 10.52560/2713-0118-2021-6-22-30
Supplementary files
