Architectonics of individual taxation system
- Authors: Tikhonova A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 5 (2023)
- Pages: 27-53
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/2454-065X/article/view/360731
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GRKPKW
- ID: 360731
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Transformation of national economies caused by globalization and digitalization of business processes leads to changes in the whole chain of relationships at the levels of "state-individual", "employee-employer", "tax authority-taxpayer". The following research goal is to develop a unified construct of the taxation system, taking into account modern transformation processes and system economy principles. The research applies a comprehensive approach, which includes three main analysis methods: qualitative comparative analysis, simulation modeling, and interpretative qualitative research. Qualitative comparative analysis was used to identify the elements of individual taxation. Simulation modeling was used to visualize taxation main parameters and limitations. Interpretative research was used to describe the interaction of the system elements. The scientific novelty of the research is the presented architectonics of individual taxation system, which develops the theory of system economy of Kleiner and includes 4 elements (subsystems), classified by the criterion of definiteness of time and space. First, objects – exist in the uncertainty of time and the certainty of space. Second, projects - exist in limited time and defined space. Third, environments – exist in the indefiniteness of time and the uncertainty of space. Fourth, processes - exist in limited time and uncertainty of space. The elements of the objective subsystem include taxpayers individuals and individual entrepreneurs, tax authorities, tax agents, other participants of tax legal relations, and the territory. The project subsystem includes tools and mechanisms of tax regulation, which are experimental and temporary in nature. Tax functions implementation was visualized in the context of the presented system.
About the authors
Anna Vital'evna Tikhonova
Email: samozvanka_89@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8295-8113
References
Леонтьев Б.Б. Обоснование теории системной экономики // Правовая информатика. 2015. №4. С. 4-21. Алиев С.Б. Правовой мониторинг регулирования интеллектуальной собственности в Евразийском экономическом пространстве // Мониторинг правоприменения. 2015. №3 (16). С. 4-13. Цокова В.А., Кабисова А.Р., Халин А.А. Методологические аспекты анализа сущности налоговой системы на основе системного подхода // Экономические исследования. 2013. № 1. С. 5. Шмелев Ю.Д. Концепция реформирования налоговой системы Российской Федерации, основанная на реализации принципа справедливости и социальной функции налогов: дис. доктора экономических наук: 08.00.10 – Финансы, денежное обращение и кредит. Москва. 2008. 459 с. Makoto Nakajima Capital income taxation with housing // Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 2020. Vol. 115. 103883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2020.103883. Horne R., Felsenstein D. Is property assessment really essential for taxation? Evaluating the performance of an ‘Alternative Assessment’ method // Land Use Policy. 2010. Vol. 27. Is. 4. P. 1181-1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.03.008. Morini M., Pellegrino S. Personal income tax reforms: A genetic algorithm approach // European Journal of Operational Research. 2018. Vol. 264. Is. 3. P. 994-1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.059. Benczúr P., Kátay G., Kiss Á. Assessing the economic and social impact of tax and benefit reforms: A general-equilibrium microsimulation approach applied to Hungary // Economic Modelling. 2018. Vol. 75. P. 441-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.06.016. Bhattarai K., Benjasak C. Growth and redistribution impacts of income taxes in the Thai Economy: A dynamic CGE analysis // The Journal of Economic Asymmetries. 2020. Vol. 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2020.e00189. Тихонова А.В. Имитационное математическое моделирование системы подоходного налогообложения с использованием критерия Q-Тьюки // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2019. Т. 12. № 1. С. 138-152. doi: 10.15838/esc.2019.1.61.8 Avram S., Popova D. Do taxes and transfers reduce gender income inequality? Evidence from eight European welfare states // Social Science Research. 2021. 102644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102644. Frey C., Christoph A. Schaltegger Progressive taxes and top income shares: A historical perspective on pre-and post-tax income concentration in Switzerland // Economics Letters 2016. Vol. 148. P. 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.08.041. Nicolis G., Prigogine I. Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems // Wiley, New York, NY. 1977. Statistics on labour income and inequality. Режим доступа: https://ilostat.ilo.org/topics/labour-income/ (дата обращения: 05.09.2023). Glogowsky U. Behavioral responses to inheritance and gift taxation: Evidence from Germany // Journal of Public Economics. 2021. Vol. 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104309. Ксиропулос И.Д. Налоговые инструменты социальной поддержки населения / И.Д. Ксиропулос // Налоги и налогообложение. 2017. № 6. С. 43-57. Клейнер Г.Б. Стратегия системной гармонизации экономики России // Экономические стратегии. 2008. № 5-6. С.72-79. Roundy P.T., Bradshaw M., Beverly K. Brockman The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach // Journal of Business Research. 2018. Vol. 86. P. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.032. Najmaei A. Using mixed-methods designs to capture the essence of complexity in the entrepreneurship research: An introductory essay and a research agenda // E.S.C. Berger, A. Kuckertz (Eds.), Complexity in entrepreneurship, innovation and technology research. 2016. P. 13-36. Fiss P.C. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations // Academy of Management Review. 2007. Vol. 32 (4). P. 1180-1198. Berger E.S.C. Is qualitative comparative analysis an emerging method? Structured literature review and bibliometric analysis of QCA applications in business and management research // E.S.C. Berger, A. Kuckertz (Eds.), Complexity in entrepreneurship, innovation and technology research. 2016. P. 1-9. Olya H.G., Mehran J. Modelling tourism expenditure using complexity theory // Journal of Business Research. 2017. Vol. 75 (2). P. 147-158. McKelvey B. Toward a complexity science of entrepreneurship // Journal of Business Venturing. 2004. Vol. 19 (3). P. 313-341. Graebner M.E., Martin J.A., Roundy P.T. Qualitative data: Cooking without a recipe // Strategic Organization. 2012. Vol. 10 (3). P. 276-284. Милоголов Н.С., Пономарева К.А. Международная кооперация налоговых администраций при налогообложении цифровых бизнес-моделей: миф или реальность? // Налоги. 2021. № 3. С. 29-33. Marenzi A., Rizzi D., Zanette M. Incentives for voluntary health insurance in a national health system: Evidence from Italy // Health Policy. 2021. Vol. 125. Is. 6. P. 685-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.03.007. Тюрина Ю.Г. Теоретические аспекты применения системного подхода в налогообложении // Экономика. Налоги. Право. 2017. №2. С. 128-133. Bertalanffy L. Stoffwechseltypen und Wachstumstypen, 61, Biol Zentralbt. 1941. P. 510-530. Клейнер Г.Б. Принципы двойственности в свете системной экономической теории // Вопросы экономики. 2019. № 11. С. 127-149. Quade E.S. Analysis for Military Decisions // United States air force project rent. 1964. 394 p. Tran C., Wende S. On the marginal excess burden of taxation in an overlapping generations model // Journal of Macroeconomics. 2021. 103377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2021.103377. Fehr H., Kindermann F. Taxing capital along the transition-Not a bad idea after all? // J. Econom. Dynam. Control. 2015. Vol. 51. P. 64. Kindermann F., Mayr L., Sachs D. Inheritance taxation and wealth effects on the labor supply of heirs // Journal of Public Economics. 2020. Vol. 191. 104127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104127. Christl M., Köppl–Turyna M., Lorenz H., Kucsera D. Redistribution within the tax-benefits system in Austria // Economic Analysis and Policy. 2020. Vol. 68. P. 250-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.09.011
Supplementary files
