Cognitive mistakes of codependents as a way to protect against uncertainty
- 作者: Artemtseva N.G.1, Malkina M.A.1
-
隶属关系:
- Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- 期: 卷 19, 编号 1 (2022)
- 页面: 153-166
- 栏目: General psychology
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/1991-8569/article/view/70870
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2022.1.11
- ID: 70870
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
The paper is devoted to the problem of studying the inner subjective world of a codependent personality. Despite the active scientific studies of the phenomenon of codependency in recent years, there is still room for new ideas in this area. The problem under study is interesting and relevant both for psychological science in general, and for practical and consulting psychology. The purpose of the study presented in the paper is to identify cognitive mistakes inherent in individuals with actualized codependency. Codependency is considered not only as being close to a dependent relative, but more broadly as a set of certain patterns of thinking and behavioral characteristics. As a result of the study, the severity of certain cognitive errors in codependent subjects was found. Cognitive errors of thinking that are present both in the group of actualized codependents and in the group of non-actualized codependents are revealed. When comparing the indicators of the severity of cognitive errors in codependent men and women, a general trend of the presence of cognitive errors was found: in actualized codependents, the indicators of men and women do not differ, and in non-actualized codependents, almost all cognitive errors are significantly more pronounced than in men. It is shown that cognitive errors aimed at avoiding uncertainty prevail in people with actualized codependency. It is concluded that the cognitive errors identified in codependents are not just associated with a state of uncertainty, but can also be a way to protect against it. The results of the research can be used in the development of therapeutic strategies for correcting the manifestations of codependency through awareness and correction of cognitive mistakes.
作者简介
Natalia Artemtseva
Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: artyomtseva@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9212-0234
Cand. Psych. Sci., Associate Professor, Senior Researcher of the Institute of Psychology of RAS
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowMalkina Malkina
Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: hatiha@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7982-5130
psychologist, applicant of the Institute of Psychology of RAS
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow参考
- Mukasheva A.E. Internet-zavisimost’ u molodezhi v usloviyakh samoizolyatsii. [Internet addiction among young people in conditions of self-isolation]. Molodyye uchenyye Rossii: sbornik statey IV Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. [Young scientists of Russia: collection of articles of the IV All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference]. Moscow: ICNS «Science and Education», 2020. Pp. 281–283.
- Rasskazova E.I., Leont’yev D.A., Lebedeva A.A. Pandemic as a challenge to subjective well-being: anxiety and coping. Materials of the Conference «Challenges of the pandemic COVID-19». Moscow: Publishing house of FGBOU VO MGPPU, 2020. Vol. 1. Pp. 142–161.
- Mikhina M.V. Neopredelennost’: osnovnyye kharakteristiki i opredeleniye. [Uncertainty: main characteristics and definition]. Innovatsionnaya nauka [Innovative science]. 2018. Vol. 2. No. 5. Pp. 140–143.
- Kornilova T.V. Psikhologiya neopredelennosti: edinstvo intellektual’no-lichnostnoy regulyatsii resheniy i vyborov. [Psychology of uncertainty: the unity of intellectual and personal regulation of decisions and elections]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. 2013. Vol. 34. No. 3. Pp. 89–100.
- Mishel M.H. Reconceptualization of the uncertainty in illness theory. Image J. Nurs. Sch. 1990, No. 22, Pp. 256–262.
- Klaich K., Loveys B.J. Breast cancer: Demands of illness. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1991. No. 18. Pp. 75–80.
- Mast M.E. Adult uncertainty in illness: A critical review of the research. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice. 1995. No. 9. Pp. 3–24.
- Weiner C.L., Dodd M.J. Coping amid uncertainty: An illness trajectory perspective. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice. 1993. Vol. 7. No. 1. Pp. 17–31.
- Lifintseva A.A., Derkach T.D., Shtolde N. Fenomen neopredelennosti kak sub’yektivnyy opyt patsiyenta v situatsii bolezni. [The phenomenon of uncertainty as a subjective experience of a patient in a disease situation]. Klinicheskaya i spetsial’naya psikhologiya. [Clinical and special psychology]. 2018. Vol. 7. No. 1. Pp. 1–12.
- Emel’yanova E.V. Krizis v sozavisimykh otnosheniyakh. Printsipy i algoritmy konsul’tirovaniya. [Crisis in codependent relationships. Principles and algorithms of consulting]. Saint Petersburg: Rech’, 2014. 320 p.
- Rukovodstvo po addiktologii. [Guide to Addictology]. Ed. by prof. V.D. Mendelevicha. Saint Petersburg: Rech’, 2007. 768 p.
- Moskalenko V.D. Zavisimost’ — semeynaya bolezn’. [Addiction — is a family disease]. Moscow: Publishing House «Institute of Consulting and System Solutions», 2018. 352 p.
- Burney R. Codependence: the Dance of Wounded Souls. NY: Joy to You & Me Enterprises, 2012. 130 p.
- Artemtseva N.G. Fenomen sozavisimosti: obshcheye, tipologicheskoye, individual’noye. [The phenomenon of codependency: general, typological, individual]. Moscow: Publishing House «Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences», 2017. 227 p.
- Bacon I., McKay E., Reynolds F., & McIntyre A. An Examination of the Lived Experience of Attending Twelve-Step Groups for Co-dependency. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2020. Pp. 1–16.
- Barone M., Leedom L. Social Construction of the Abuse Experience:Traumatic Bonding or Co-Dependency? Department of Counseling University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport. CT, 2017.
- Askian P., Krauss S.E., Baba M. et al. Recovering from co-dependence: A study of iranian wives of persons with substance use disorder. Current Psychology. 2021. Vol. 40. Pp. 1234–1248.
- Vederhus J.K., Kristensen Ø., Timko C. How do psychological characteristics of family members affected by substance use influence quality of life? Quality Life Researh. 2019. Vol. 28. Pp. 2161–2170.
- Beatty M. Spasat’ ili spasat’sya? Kak izbavit’sya ot zhelaniya postoyanno opekat’ drugikh i nachat’ dumat’ o sebe. [Save or be saved? How to get rid of the desire to constantly patronize others and start thinking about yourself]. Моscow: Bombora, 2020. 352 p.
- Beck A., Freeman A. Kognitivnaya psikhoterapiya rasstroystv lichnosti. [Cognitive therapy of personality disorders]. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2019, 448 p.
- Freeman A., Dewulf R. 10 glupeyshikh oshibok, kotoryye sovershayut lyudi [10 stupidest mistakes that people make]. Saint Petersburg: Peter, 2012. 240 p.
- Darvishi, E., Golestan, S., Demehri, F. et al. A Cross-Sectional Study on Cognitive Errors and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders among Young People During the Outbreak of Coronavirus Disease. Activitas Nervosa Superior. 2019. Vol. 62. Pp. 137–142.
- Bobrov A.E., Fayzrakhmanova E.V. The Cognitive Mistakes Questionnaire as a Tool for Assessing Components of Pathological Anxiety. Nevrologiya Psikhiatriya. 2017. No. 8(137). Pp. 59–65.
- Leont’yev D.A. The challenge of uncertainty as the central problem of personality psychology. Psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya [Psychological Research]. 2015. Vol. 8. No. 40. P. 2.
- McCormick К.М. A concept analysis of uncertainty in illness. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2002. Vol. 32. No. 2. Pp. 27–131.
- Kahneman D., Slovik P., Tversky A. Prinyatiye resheniy v neopredelennosti: pravila i predubezhdeniya. [Decision-making in uncertainty: Rules and biases]. Kharkiv: Publishing House Institute of Applied Psychology «Humanitarian Center», 2021. 540 p.
- Sazonova S.D. Ustanovki lichnosti v situatsii adaptatsii k neopredelennosti. [Personality attitudes in the situation of adaptation to uncertainty]. Samara: Samara State Technical University, 2018. Pp. 234–237.
- Peele S., Brodsky A. Lyubov’ i zavisimost’. [Love and addiction]. Moscow: Institute of General Humanitarian Research, 2017. 308 p.
- Peele S., Brodsky A. Love and addiction. Watertown, Broadrow Publications, 2015., 326 p.
- Kaneman D. Dumay medlenno... reshay bystro. [Think slowly... decide quickly]. Моscow: АSТ, 2020. 704 p.
- Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Books Ltd., 2011. 512 p.
- Chater N., Felin T., Funder D.C. et al. Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate. Psychol. Bull. Rev. 2018. Vol. 25. Pp. 793–826.
- Natovich E.A., Tkhostov A.Sh., Teperik R.F. Patologicheskaya zavisimost’ ot azartnykh igr: psikhoanaliticheskiy podkhod [Pathological dependence on gambling: a psychoanalytic approach]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. [Bulletin of the Moscow University]. 2012. No. 2. Pp. 138–151.
- Tkhostov A.Sh. Psikhologiya telesnosti. [Psychology of corporeality]. Moscow: Smysl, 2002. 287 p.
- Vasilyuk F.E. Psikhologiya perezhivaniya (analiz preodoleniya kriticheskikh situatsiy). [Psychology of experience (analysis of overcoming critical situations)]. Моscow: Moscow State University, 1984. 200 p.
- Legkostayeva E.S. Cognitive mistakes of persons suffering from severe somatic diseases]. Modern problems of science and education (scientific journal). 2018. No. 5. P. 94.
- Asmolov A.G. Psikhologiya sovremennosti: vyzovy neopredelennosti, slozhnosti i raznoobraziya [Psychology of modernity: the challenges of uncertainty, complexity and diversity]. Psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya [Psychological Studies]. 2015. Vol. 8. No. 40. P. 1.
- Artemtseva N.G. Sozavisimost’ kak sposob sotsial’no-psikhologicheskoy adaptatsii. [Codependence as a way of socio-psychological adaptation]. Chelovek. Iskusstvo. Vselennaya. [Person. Art. Universe]. 2018. No. 1. Pp. 120–124.
- Freeman A., DeWolf R. The 10 dumbest mistakes smart people make and how avoid them. NY: William Morrow and company, 1993. 320 p.
- Artemtseva N.G. Fenomen sozavisimosti: psikhologicheskiy aspect. [The phenomenon of codependency: a psychological aspect]. Moscow: Publishing House RIO MGUDT, 2012. 222 p.
- Kolenova A.S. Soderzhatel’nyye i dinamicheskiye osobennosti tsennostno-smyslovoy sfery zhenshchin v usloviyakh sozavisimykh otnosheniy: Avtoref. dis. kand. ps. nauk. [Content and dynamic features of the value-semantic sphere of women in the conditions of codependent relationships. Abstract of thesis cand. of psy. sci.]. Rostov-on-Don, 2019.
- Beattie M. The New Codependency. NY: Simon & Schuster, 2009. 288 p.
- Kazemi Rezaei S.A., Khoshsorour S., Nouri R. The Discriminative Role of Metacognitive Beliefs, Difculty of Emotion Regulation, and Codependency in Women With Obesity. Journal of Arak University of Medical Sciences (JAMS). 2019. Vol. 22. No. 4. Pp. 86-97.
- Clark D.J. Escaping the Drama Triangle: Strategies for Successful Research Administration from the Psychology of Codependence. Journal of Research Administration. 2020. Vol. 51. No. 2. Pp. 84–10.
- Wegscheider-Cruse S. Choicemaking for Co-Dependents, Adult Children and Spirituality Seekers. NY: Health Communications, Inc., 1985. 216 p.
补充文件
