Common property of a simple partnership as the basis of corporate management
- Authors: Laptev V.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: No 6 (2024)
- Pages: 102-110
- Section: Civil and entrepreneurial law
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/1026-9452/article/view/263264
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945224060088
- ID: 263264
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
As a result of the inclusion in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of a simple partnership as a contractual form of an entrepreneurial association of an economic type in domestic jurisprudence, the need arose to comply with its legal status, including legal personality, as well as the legal regime during its general development and drawing up the foundations of entrepreneurial and other economic activities. Purpose of the study: to establish the essential characteristics and features of the legal regime of general damage to a simple partnership. Objectives of the study: identifying certain types of common property; analysis of legislation and approaches to judicial practice on the issue under consideration; determining the role of general damage in the activities of a simple partnership. Research methods. The work used theoretical (analysis and synthesis, including methods of system analysis) and empirical methods of scientific knowledge (observation, description). Scientific methods are also used (formal-logical, historical-legal, legal comparative studies, hermen’s and synergetic). Results: national legislation establishes the legal regulation of the general damage regime of a simple partnership, the subsidiary application of the general provisions of constitutional legislation, which should not contradict the conditions and capital intended for the study of this property.
Full Text
About the authors
Vasily A. Laptev
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: laptev.va@gmail.com
Doctor of Law, Chief Researcher, Institute of State and Law
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Andreev V. K. Organizational and legal forms of the inclusion of high technologies in industrial production // Yurist. 2023. No 9. Pp. 35–40 (in Russ.).
- Vitol’ E. Yu., Tyulyaev G. S. The relevance of the consortium design for Russian law // Herald of Civil Law. 2018. No. 1. Pp. 50–85 (in Russ.).
- Goreva A. A. A simple partnership agreement and its types: Russian law in the comparative legal aspect // Herald of Civil Law. 2020. No. 6. Pp. 30–66 (in Russ.).
- Civil Law: textbook: in 3 vols. Vol. 2. 4th ed., rev. and exp. / ed. by. A. P. Sergeev, Yu. K. Tolstoj. M., 2005. Vol. 2 (in Russ.).
- Greshnikov I. P. Subjects of Civil Law: a legal entity in the right of ownership and legislation. SPb., 2002. P. 762 (in Russ.).
- Domshenko (Chervets) E. I. Separation of property without creating a legal entity. Simple partnership and investment partnership // Herald of Civil Law. 2021. No. 6. Pp. 30–58 (in Russ.).
- Ershova I. V. Russian Business Law. M., 2006. P. 319 (in Russ.).
- Kozlova N. V. Legal personality of a legal entity. M., 2005 (in Russ.).
- Kozyarsky V. A. The legal status of a simple partnership in the Russian Federation and a civil law partnership in Germany // Modern law. 2011. No. 8. Pp. 43–47 (in Russ.).
- Laptev V. A. Corporate Law: legal organization of corporate systems: monograph. M., 2019 (in Russ.).
- Laptev V. A. The concept and legal personality of a corporation in Russia and abroad // Herald of Kutafin University (MSLA). 2016. No. 3 (19). Pp. 178–191 (in Russ.).
- Laptev V. A. Business associations: holdings, financial and industrial groups, simple partnerships. M., 2008 (in Russ.).
- Laptev V. V. Subjects of Business Law: textbook. M., 2003. P. 161 (in Russ.).
- Lisitsa V. N. Investment Law. Novosibirsk, 2015 (in Russ.).
- Modern Business Law / I. V. Ershova, L. V. Andreeva, N. G. Apresova et al. M., 2014.
- Subjects of Civil Law / res. ed. T. E. Abova. M., 2000 (in Russ.).
- Shitkina I. S. Holdings: legal and managerial aspects. Legislative and other regulatory acts. Professional comment of the PhD in Law. M., 2002. Pp. 107, 110 (in Russ.).
