On Setting the Level of Seismic Effect in Seismic Intensity Scales and Design Standards
- 作者: Nesterova O.P.1, Tkachenko A.S.1, Uzdin A.M.1, Dolgaya A.A.2, Smirnova L.N.3, Youhai G.4
-
隶属关系:
- St. Petersburg State University of Transport
- OAO Transmost
- Kucherenko Central Research Center of Building Structures
- China University of Petroleum
- 期: 卷 55, 编号 1 (2019)
- 页面: 111-116
- 栏目: Article
- URL: https://bakhtiniada.ru/0747-9239/article/view/177741
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923919010110
- ID: 177741
如何引用文章
详细
It is noted in the article that the increase in peak ground acceleration (PGA) by a factor of about 1.4 proposed by seismologists in a project of seismic intensity scale clearly reflects the lessons learned from earthquakes of the past. However, the use of suggested PGA values in the design codes and standards requires modification of the codes and standards themselves, as well as differentiated approach to defining the design level of PGA. Engineers should consider the dependence of the design PGA on the oscillation periods of structures, whereas seismologists should differentiate the PGA value depending on the prevailing period of the seismic effect. Transition to the new seismic scale affects the design and maximum design earthquakes differently. The intensity of a design earthquake for objects of massive structure does not exceed VII on the MSK scale, and in this aspect the new seismic scale does not differ considerably from the existing one. For maximum design earthquakes, PGA increases significantly, but the criterion of seismic resistance changes from acceleration of the structure to the work of plastic deformation forces. In this case, possible destruction depends little on PGA, but rather on such energy seismic effect characteristics as the Arias intensity, absolute cumulative velocity, and seismic energy density. A correct approach to calculation when carrying out the performance-based design and transition to the new intensity scale would not lead to higher costs for most buildings and structures. Moreover, if one does not use the new scale, transition to modern methods of performance-based design will be impossible.
作者简介
O. Nesterova
St. Petersburg State University of Transport
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: Neona975@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg, 190031
A. Tkachenko
St. Petersburg State University of Transport
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: tm@pgups.ru
俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg, 190031
A. Uzdin
St. Petersburg State University of Transport
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: uzdin@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg, 190031
A. Dolgaya
OAO Transmost
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: anzhelika-dolgaya@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg, 190013
L. Smirnova
Kucherenko Central Research Center of Building Structures
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: lyubovsmirnova80@gmail.com
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow, 109428
Guan Youhai
China University of Petroleum
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: 329953890@qq.com
中国, Qingdao, 266580
补充文件
