Musing on Use and Misuse of Numerical Data of Quantities in Measurement Science


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The empirical numerical value of a quantity is not a number that can be treated as a simple mathematical object. The digits are not only determined by the chosen reference, but also by the full process that allowed setting them. The evaluation not only is affected by uncertainty, but the uncertainty level can be chosen from many “levels of confidence.” The latter establishes the degree of possibility that the available numerical value is reasonably acceptable as the actual numerical value of the quantity in question. Consequently, there are different ways to treat the digits of the same numerical values expressing the magnitude of the same quantity. This paper illustrates the above issues by using as examples the “fundamental constants” proposed for use in the new SI definition: Planck, Boltzmann, electrical charge, and Avogadro.

作者简介

F. Pavese

IMEKO

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: frpavese@gmail.com
意大利, Torino

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature, 2019